Wednesday, August 31, 2005

Hello from middle America

I just wanted to write and say "hi" to all my faithful blog readers, which I assume number about one after not posting for the last two weeks.

I really apologize. I don't like the thought of people checking for posts and then being disappointed when there is nothing there. Of course, I am probably flattering myself far too much by thinking that people are really going to be saddened by the lack of pdates. But hey, a boy can dream, right?

Anyway, a combination of laziness, slow internet connections, and a constant stream of activity have prevented me from posting. Oh, and having to share a computer with J1 and S4. Hahahahaha.

Currently, I am at my parents' house in Michigan. (Hence the subject line -- I really am in middle America. You know, the place where it's really flat, there are a lot of trees, you pass trucks
carrying large John Deere farm equipment, and people dress really poorly.) I got here this afternoon.

While I would like to give more details, I will have to be content for now to give a brief overview.

My time in California was great, for the most part. It was pretty much an endless orgy of eating and shopping, which suits me pretty well. I bought a ton of cool stuff, including a bunch of vintage stuff from thrift stores and three new pairs of jeans. Since I lost a ton of weight after J1 and I got together, all my old jeans were falling off me. Now, I have jeans I actually feel good about wearing.

Highlights of the trip included spending time with my dear, departed-from-New-York friend Jammie and getting to hang out with many of J1's friends, such as the lovely Rae, Irene, Maggie, and Ryan. Oh, did I just include Ryan on the list of lovely people? Yes, yes, I did. Because, you see my dear readers, we are talking about internal beauty, not external glitz. We also had a nice time with J1's immediate and extended family.

J1 and I also had an awesome time at the Hollywood Bowl seeing a concert. I think it was my favorite date we've ever been on.

Of course, there were some sad and stressful parts to the trip, but I'd rather not dwell on that here. Suffice to say that we got through it all just fine. What did the Beatles say? "I get by with a little help from my friends."

Someday, when I return to civilization and a reasonable interweb connection, I will post pictures of all the awesomeness.

Tuesday night, I took the red eye to Detroit. Some friends of mine picked me up at the airport and I got to see them for the first time in a year and a half. That was very nice -- it is good to
catch up with old friends, ya know?

Eventually, I made it back home. My sister is also home, and she brought her new boyfriend. Should be an interesting few days is all I can say.

Ok, apparently my sister wants to sleep, so I have to go. I will talk to you all soon, I hope.

Here's a cheerful number...

$130,410.

That's the amount that I owe the Access Group (including this year's loans). That number doesn't even include my Perkins loans.

I really wanted to get out of law school with less than $100,000 in debt. That is clearly not happening. Between the drastic increases in tuition over my three years here, not getting a firm job after my first year, and spending the money that I did earn rather profligately, I am going to end up with nearly $150,000 in debt instead.

I'm going to have so much fun paying this back.

Tuesday, August 16, 2005

Nightsweats, computer issues, and haircuts (aka Random News)

In happier news, I'm feeling substantially better today. I'm certainly not 100%, but I at least can get out and around without feeling like a ton of bricks is crushing my head.

The turning point was yesterday evening when I started sweating like I've never sweated before. Weirdly enough, I didn't even have a fever. Obviously, it's typical to sweat when a fever breaks. But despite having no fever to break, I sweated out whatever toxins were making me sick. It was a little gross, but it must have worked, because I felt substantially better afterwards.

Random news, part II: K1 cut my hair tonight. It's looks good, because K1 has the haircutting skillz to pay the billz.

For my birthday, she got me a pair of hair clippers to make the haircuts easier/faster. They are the shizzle. In addition to cutting hair, they make me want to talk in jive all the time.

Random news, part III: I finished upgrading my desktop pc last week. I added a new hard drive, doubled the amount of RAM, and put in a USB 2.0 card.

All went without too much of a hitch, except for one issue:
The hard drive (a Western Digital Caviar edition) is labeled as 200 gb. However, when I hooked it up to the computer, Windows would only recognize it as 130 gb. I don't really know what's happening to the extra 70 gb. The bios recognizes that it's 200 gb. But Windows doesn't seem to know this. I don't know if my IDE controller won't handle anything over 130 gb or what. If any of you computer people who know more than me about these things have any suggestions, I would appreciate it.

How to deal with difficult situations

Well, bad news came last night. J1's grandfather passed away Monday afternoon. This necessitated a change in our travel plans -- rather than leaving for California next Wednesday, we are flying out Friday morning for the funeral on Saturday.

It's interesting how, in times of pain like this, it becomes disturbingly obvious that some people "get" how to deal with people who are going through a difficult times and others just have no idea of what is appropriate behavior.

Two experiences made this clear:

1. We needed to change out JetBlue tickets to fly out earlier. Every other airline that I know of has a bereavement policy, which allows last-minute purchases or changes to flight itineraries in case of family emergencies/deaths. JetBlue, which claims to be such a great airline with good customer service and friendly employees, apparently has no such policy. fn1.

The first person J1 spoke to was very sympathetic and said he would check with his supervisor to see if there was anything that they could do to help her out. Unfortunately, her phone dropped the call. When she called back, she got some cold woman who told her there was nothing they could do and that she was going to have to pay the fare difference.

First of all, having to bereavement policy is no way to run an airline, particularly one which claims to have quality customer service. Secondly, the second CSR could have at least tried to do something, even if she thought it was a long shot. But she clearly had no interest in providing a positive customer service experience.

So I have to get a big thumbs down to JetBlue. Time to find the soul that your ads claim you have.

2. J1 was scheduled to play piano for a recording composed and being sung by one of her classmates. They were supposed to rehearse on Friday and cut it in the studio on Tuesday. Obviously, the change of events made this impossible. J1 emailed her, informing her of the situation and offering the services of her roommate (also a skilled pianist and sight reader) for the recording.

This morning, the classmate called J1 and basically bitched her out for being unable to do the recording. It takes a special kind of person to make an event like a wedding or a funeral in which they have no part all about them. This girl is precisely this special kind of person. She was so concerned about how this might disrupt her schedule and how this might inconvenience her that she couldn't focus on J1's loss and the fact that this was COMPLETELY out of her control.

She actually said "People die at the most inconvenient times, huh?" It's one thing if you think that in your head -- it's still a jackass thing to think, but many of us would privately have the same thought. But to say it out loud, especially to the person who just suffered this loss, is beyond rude. There are just no words...

So the takeaway point from all this: be one of those people who makes these kinds of situations better, not worse.

1. Clearly I would not have fallen under the policy of any airline out there (as I was not related to the person who died), unless the airline was bending the rules. But at the very least, J1 should have been able to change her ticket without having to pay the fare difference.

Monday, August 15, 2005

Forces of nature

Witnessed a weird natural phenomena last night. As people in the NY area know, we got pounded with pretty intense thunderstorms for four hours or so. There was a ton of lightening and it seemed to be really close by.

After one particularly close strike, there was a loud CRACK and a yellow flash in my room. It was like lightening had struck my apartment.

The only thing I can figure out is that there was so much static electricity in the air of my apartment that a nearby lightening strike caused it to ignite. Or something like that. I'm a little weak in the whole physics/natural science area. It was kind of frightening, but rather cool.

In other news, I got sick this weekend with some kind of sinus infection. It is pretty miserable. I don't feel terrible (no fever), but my sinuses are completely clogged and draining despite my sinus meds. So I've been trying to relax and lay low until I feel better.

I'm a Composer

For about the 30th time, I took a Keirsey personal test online. As usual, I got a different result. I think I get a completely different result every time I take the test. This either means that
a.) my personality is in a constant state of flux;
b.) I don't know myself particularly well; or
c.) the tests are completely unreliable.

This result captured some interesting parts of my personality, but it didn't seem to be 100% on.





ISFP - the Composer
You scored 27% I to E, 63% N to S, 23% F to T, and 57% J to P!
Your type is best described by the single word "composer", which belongs to the larger group, experiencers. You are very in touch with the physical world, and have an eye for detail. You are likely to be very artistic in some form or another. You don't wish to lead at all. Your attitude is very much "live and let live" to the point that others may have accused you of having no opinions or ambitions. You share your personality type with 10% of the population.
As a romantic partner, you are nuturing and supportive, often putting your partner's needs before your own. You struggle when you feel anger or resentment, because the last thing you want to do is engage in confrontation. You need patience, support, and encouragement to discuss problems in constructive ways (as opposed to not at all.) You want a deep and intimate connection with your partner. You feel most appreciated when your partner is grateful for your thoughtfulness and willingness to help. You most want your partner to reciprocate with spontaneous thoughtful acts to show you how important you are to them.
Your group summary: experiencers (SP)
Your Type Summary: ISFP

Link: The LONG Scientific Personality Test written by unpretentious2 on Ok Cupid

Friday, August 12, 2005

Goodbye

Well, the summer is over. I must say I feel kind of sad. I wish I could skip over the next year and just start work. In many ways, I view the first couple years of work as merely a stepping stone to getting to someplace where I really want to be, so the sooner I can start them, the sooner I can get on with my life.

On the other hand, I can guarantee that on Monday morning, when I sleep in until 10:00 am or so rather than hearing my alarm go off at 7:45, I won't be missing work too much at all. fn1.

After an incredible lunch at Megu (more on that later, perhaps), I had to scramble to finish up my last memo. It turned out ok -- it wasn't great, but hopefully it will provide minimal satisfaction for the partner while insuring that I will NEVER end up in the tax department.

This morning, I had cleaned up my desk and done all the other administrative crap I needed to finish. So I packed up my few personal items (highlighted by matches and postcards from some of the summer's better restaurants) and turned in my office key, bid some friends goodbye, and was off.

In parting, here's a few shots of my office and view that I took a couple weeks ago.





1. Bringing back memories of one of the best lines from Office Space:
Bob: Peter, it looks like you've been missing a lot of work lately.
Peter: Oh, I wouldn't say I've been missing it, Bob.

The name game

I just had to evaluate some applications for my law journal from transfer students. For whatever reason, the transfer applications are not done anonymously.

All I can say is that the regular applicants should be glad that they didn't have to put their names on their applications. When I open up your resume and it says "Patterson Williams IV" at the top, I have a really hard time looking at you seriously. fn1. Particularly given the law school this person attended (I don't want to give the name, but I will say it's named after a famous Confederate general), it's just screaming "I am a WASPy tool!"

Anyway, I think given the circumstances, I was more than fair and somewhat generous in my evaluation of these applicants. They were a fairly uninspiring lot, but I found some nice (and accurate) things to say.

1. Patterson Williams IV wasn't the actual name, but it was that "style" of name -- a first name that should have been a last name and a roman numeral at the end.

The last day

Well, after fourteen weeks, some real work, some frustration, a ton of fun, and a lot of really good lunches, my stint as a summer associate is a few hours from ending. It is, of course, a cause for some sadness on my part.

Being a summer associate is the best job this side of being a trust fund baby. You are paid well, spend eight hours a day in the office (well, maybe four hours, after subtracting lunches, coffee breaks, etc), are underworked, have few expectations or pressures on you, and are treated like royalty, with lunches at the city's top restaurants, Broadway shows, movies, golf outings, and the like. There is really nothing to complain about, other than the assignments which sometimes interrupt your blog-writing or the occasional meeting which torpedos a lunch at Gramercy Tavern.

It's also been fun to meet new people and make some great new friends over the course of the summer. While there are people in my summer associate class who I won't miss, I did make some good friends, and I'll miss hanging out with them once we're all back in school.

For now, it's a few more hours of enjoying the incredible view out my window, finishing up a memo for the tax department, going on one last lunch (destination to be determined), and clearing out my office.

As I leave, one funny email exchange from earlier in the summer, involving me and a couple of my friends.

TO: Several Summer Associates
FROM: BRY
TIME: 3:21 PM
Meet on the Plaza around 3:45 for coffee with [Female Associate].

TO: BRY
FROM: Val (one of the summers)
TIME: 3:22 PM
We're really all invited? Or. . . just one of us? (fn1)

TO: Val
FROM: BRY
TIME: 3:28 PM
Well, since you mentioned it, I really only wanted Sean [Val's officemate] to come. But I had to include you on the list because you share an office with him and he might tell you otherwise.

So my point is that really only Sean is invited.

There. I answered your question. Are you freaking happy now??

TO: BRY
FROM: Val
TIME: 3:29 PM
WOW! Just for that, I'm coming.

TO: Val
FROM: BRY
TIME: 3:29 PM
Well, if you're coming, I'm not.

TO: BRY
FROM: Val
TIME: 3:29 PM
Sweet! Mission accomplished.

TO: Val
FROM: BRY
TIME: 3:30 PM
Man, and I thought I was snobby. You want it so it's only you and Sean.

TO: BRY
FROM: Val
TIME: 3:30 PM
Nope. I told him that you didn't want him to come, so he's not either. (He's crying.) Just meeee and [Female associate]!


At this point, Val is laughing so hard that she's almost crying as she relays the developing conversation to Sean. Sean decides it's time to insert himself into the conversation.

TO: BRY, Val
FROM: Sean
TIME: 3:32 PM
SUBJECT: Act like lawyers
The two of you - WAY too much enthusiasm on something that isn't billable.

TO: Sean, BRY
FROM: Val
TIME: 3:33 PM
Sniffle through your tears, S.[ean] Patrick.

Probably not as funny to you all as it was to us, but it was probably the peak of our hilarious email exchanges.

1. This refers to a time early in the summer when I emailed some summers about an opening at a lunch. There was only one open spot in our reservation, so I told Val and Sean (her office mate) that only one of them could come. They've still never forgiven me.

Thursday, August 11, 2005

A new standard in fine dining

Yesterday, we got lunch at Bouley, and it instantly rocketed toward the top of my list of favorite/best restaurants. The food, the decor, the service, and the dining experience were all amazing.

Located in TriBeCa, Bouley is one of a constellation of restaurants started by chef David Bouley. The original Bouley, in operation in the early 1990s, was a fixture at the top of the Zagat rankings and received rave reviews from the New York Times. After closing that restaurant, Mr. Bouley started Bouley Bakery and Danube. After 9/11, he converted Bouley Bakery into the present incarnation of Bouley.

The restaurant is located in an unassuming, low-lying TriBeCa building. But from the moment you open the massive and weathered wood door, you know a unique dining experience awaits. The vestibule is lined with shelves holding fresh apples, giving off a pungent, fruity aroma as you enter.

Leaving the vestibule and entering the restaurant, you are immediately surrounded by class and charm. A maitre d' clad in a designer suit greets guests. We were immediately shown to our table, perfectly set and sized for our party of five (which is impressive, as many restaurants put odd-numbered parties at tables intended for an even number of diners, resulting in crowding or imbalance).

The first thing one notices is the environment. Unlike most restaurants, Bouley has a low ceiling (probably around eight to eight and a half feet). This gives an immediate aura of warmth and intimacy. Rather than feeling intimidated by high, heavy wood panelings (a la Gramercy Tavern) or feeling alone in stark open spaces (66) or even feeling welcomed by high, bright ceilings (as is the case in Union Square Cafe), the restaurant gives the distinct impression of being at home. Granted, it's the home of a rich great aunt who prefers that you keep your voices down and enjoys decorating with velvet and crystal candlesticks. But it's a home none the less.

The decor is gorgeous without being too gaudy (although I'm sure some would disagree). The dining room is lined with velvet couches and long tables, while round and square tables surrounded by plush, round-backed chairs fill the center of the room. Candlesticks adorn the mantle of a marble fireplace. (As an aside, would it be too much work for the staff to ensure the candles are straight, and not hanging jutting out at precarious angles in the holders?) Maroon, white, and cream are the dominant colors. However, there is enough light, both from the large windows and overhead lights, to keep the space from feeling claustrophobic.

The mood of the restaurant is furthered by the menus. Rather than heavy, stuffy black or brown leather menus, or post-modern minimalist menus with the selections glued to a sheet of colored cardboard, the menu jacket is a warm watercolor rendition of the interior of the restaurant.

The staff is exceptionally courteous and respectful. However, they remain friendly. They are certainly not haughty, and seem devoted to making their diners' experience as pleasant as possible. I was particularly pleased with our waiter's response when I told him I was a vegetarian. He instantly assured me that the chef had excellent vegetarian dishes that they would be happy to prepare. Compared with the confusion, indifference, or annoyance provoked by such requests at many other restaurants, this was a welcome change.

Mr. Bouley is known for creating interesting combinations of flavors, and our lunch yesterday certainly did not fail in this regard. We started with a canape of tomato sorbetto and tomato marmalade, topped with Parmesan foam. After a moment for the tastebuds to adjust (it is interesting how the mouth associates certain textures with certain tastes, and when these associations are disrupted, it takes adjustment to accept what one is tasting), it was an interesting treat.

My first course was a grilled eggplant, red pepper, goatcheese terrine. It was excellent. The subtle taste of the eggplant mixed with the spice of the red pepper, and it was complemented well by the tangy goatcheese and parsley seasoning.

The first course was served with two rolls, one sourdough and one a yellow and black raisin roll topped with a baked apple slice. The bread was good -- moist on the inside and crisp on the outside. However, it was not nearly as good as the Gramercy dinner rolls.

The second course was a coconut and garlic soup, finished with chives and basil. It was similar to the taste of coconut curry, with the sweetness of the coconut offsetting the bite of the garlic. The flavors were complementary and unique, but not particularly well-blended. The combination of striking, but at any given time, the mouth was tasting one flavor or the other, rather than a more-interesting combination.

After the second course, a waiter brought the bread cart, which had a selection of fresh-baked breads. I had the black olive bread and the garlic bread (which actually contained chunks of garlic). Other choices included pistachio bread and raisin bread. The bread was ok, but not anything too special.

The main course was pasta, if one defines pasta very loosely. There were beans, sprouts, other fresh vegetables, some sort of baked cracker, and a few pasta noodles. I wish I remembered better what was in the dish. Suffice to say that it was spot-on. It was fresh, unique, and tasted spectacular. The portion was small, but every bite was a treat. It was the highlight of my meal, which is unique to many of the restaurants I have visited this summer, where the appetizer and dessert are usually better than the main course.

For dessert, I got the chocolate souffle, which was incredible. There was some debate about whether it was as good as the souffle that comes with Nobu's Bento Box (I think the souffle at Nobu is better), but this is at least close to that offered by Nobu. It comes with three scoops of ice cream -- vanilla, maple, and chocolate. The maple was excellent, the vanilla was good, but the chocolate did not meet my expectations, as it tasted slightly chalky.

To finish off, the chef sent out strawberry, yogurt, and cream parfaits, which nicely washed down the chocolate we had just consumed.

In short, lunch at Bouley was a tremendous event. The food is top-notch: it is on par with Gramercy Tavern and Craft as far as taste and creativity go. The service is amazing as well -- I would rank it equal to Union Square Cafe and near Gramercy. The environment is also excellent, lending to a comfortable and enjoyable dining experience.

I still think Gramercy is my favorite restaurant in New York, with Bouley a close second. Judging on food alone, Bouley and Craft are probably tied for first, with Gramercy a close second.

Offered!

Just got done with my exit interview for the summer (even though my last day is tomorrow) and am in proud possession of an OFFER!!

Yes, I realize this exuberance may be slightly overblown, given that around 98% of summers get offers, but I had so much paranoia that I would be in that 2%. The whole feedback process is so opaque here that you never really know how you are doing. You are never sure if your work is up to par, or if your attitude is ok.

And in fact, since I had been informed toward the beginning of the summer that my enthusiasm level was "too low," I was especially worried that maybe I would be the sacrificial lamb to show that you had to be a good employee to get an offer. It's all very paranoid, I know. But I worry about these things.

So I'm very happy right now.

Wednesday, August 10, 2005

Just enjoying the view

In contrast to my more depressing thoughts of terror and fear, I was actually rather enjoying the view out my office window this morning. With today being the third to the last day of work this summer, I was savoring the view which I will not have the chance to see for a few months.

Today was particularly beautiful. With the sun shining and the humidity lower than it's been in months, I finally have a clear view of the harbor, being able to see the hills on Staten Island for the first time in weeks. The FujiFilm blimp slowly crawls across the sky as helicopters dart along the skyline, heading to circle the Statute of Liberty. Ferries, freighters, and sailboats cut white wakes in the blue water of the harbor. Lady Liberty herself is resplendent in the morning sun, her green copper robes shining like a beacon.

I'll miss the view. It's been a good summer, and the view was a nice part of that.

A slight scare

We had a slight scare in the financial district this morning. A fire started in the building across the street, causing streams of fire trucks and emergency vehicles to rush to the scene.

We first heard about the fire because (N), one of the other attorneys on our floor, downstairs to get coffee, emailed my officemate, telling her to bring N's purse if they evacuated our building.

We could hear a cacophony of sirens, and as we looked out our window, we could see fire trucks fighting traffic to get to the building. A delivery truck was blocking the street, and the driver seemed completely confused of where to go so that the fire trucks could pass. Seconds ticked away as the fire trucks honked and the delivery driver pulled forward, then moved in reverse, clueless of how to move out of the way.

Soon, the building fire safety director came on over the loudspeakers, informing us that we were safe at the present time and that we would be notified of any developments. Fortunately, within an hour, the "all clear" announcement came.

I still don't know the extent of the fire, but hopefully no one was badly injured. It's just a scary reminder of how real the threat of terrorism is here, particularly in the financial district. Everything that happens makes you jump a little more, wondering if it's more than just a normal electrical fire.

At this point, it seems inevitable that terrorists will strike New York. The subway attacks last month in London demonstrated the continued presence of terrorists and the ease with which they can wreak havoc. So we sit, waiting for the other shoe to drop.

We don't know when the attack is coming, or by what means. So we watch the skies, as we did a couple weeks ago when a small, low-flying plane circled the tip of Manhattan before flying off to New Jersey. The low whispers spread from office to office as people ask what is happening out our windows. We watch the streets, as fire trucks rush to fight a blaze of undetermined origins. We watch the people around us, wondering if the man with the large bag is going to blow us all into oblivion. And we hope. We hope that we won't be nearby when the strike comes.

Quote of the Day

Last night, while having dinner at Acqua:

J1: Look, the candle is making your hair glow.
BRY: I know. There is nothing more romantic than arm hair glowing in soft candlelight.

In other news, Acqua receives four thumbs up (that's two from me and two from J1). Our dinner there was fantastic. I have eaten a LOT of pasta at a lot of great restaurants this summer, and this was quite possibly the best I've had.

Located on the far north end of the Upper West Side (just below 95th Street on Amsterdam), Acqua is on the fringes of where many people will go for evening dining (and they're completely ill-situated to catch much of a lunch crowd). However, at 9:30 pm on a Tuesday night, they had a decent number of patrons, particularly on their charming, quiet patio.

We started with the Antipasto Acqua, a blend of portabello mushrooms, toasted artichoke hearts, tomatoes, white beans, and greens topped with an olive oil/herb sauce. The artichoke hearts were not particularly flavorful, but the rest of the blend was amazing. The sauce was particularly good, and made a nice dipping base for bread. The bread was fine, but nothing spectacular.

For the main course, J1 got gnocchi with an incredible mushroom sauce. The gnocchis were huge and soft, and avoided being too chewy or mushy. The mushrooms were tangy and fresh, while the sauce had a full, but not overpowering, flavor. I got the penne with eggplant and fresh mozzarella. It was excellent. The eggplant was cut small and fully marinated with the sauce to give it flavor. The mozzarella was fresh and had that perfect milky taste. The pomodoro sauce was tangy and zesty, and was a nice complement to the cheese. To top it off, the pasta was cooked perfectly. No limp, overcooked pasta from this chef.

Our final course was a nice tiramisu, which was fluffy and sweet, without the tartness that often plagues the dessert.

Overall, it was a great dinner, particularly in respect to the price. I highly recommend the restaurant.

Tuesday, August 09, 2005

I like dogs

Last night, J1 and I went to see "Must Love Dogs" for the final movie night of the summer program. We were at the Loews Imax 12 at 68 and B'Way.

When I walked up, I was surprised to see that there was a premier at the theater. It was for "The Constant Gardner," directed by Fernando Meirelles (who broke out with "City of God" a couple years ago). From the preview we saw before our movie, it looks to be a highly depressing movie about genocide in Africa, or something along that line. Anyway, Ralph Fiennes, the star of the movie, was walking the red carpet and being interviewed by random people. Of course, I would have had no idea who he was except that a lot of people were taking his picture. It was cool to see the red carpet and all the crazy entertainment press though.

The movie itself was solid, in my opinion. Of course, it has just been trashed by critics and many viewers. I disagreed, and thought that it was a perfectly fine movie in the genre.

Today, I figured out why I thought the movie was good when so many people thought it was terrible.

From my perspective, romantic comedies are never going to have a decent plot. It is just a limitation of the genre. There is virtually no way to present a believable story of two people falling madly in love in 90 to 120 minutes. The only movies that come close are ones like "When Harry Met Sally," which cover a number of years. But in general, I don't watch a romantic comedy expecting to see a story that I would believe. I assume that the limits of credulity will be stretched, and there will probably be some completely improbable coincidences that would never happen in reality.

Secondly, the leads in romantic comedies are rarely going to have any real chemistry. Sure, they may have cute/sweet interactions, and may be compelling or charming people in and of themselves (John Cusack is a master at this), but once again, you cannot create true chemistry between two random actors in less than two hours. Of course, some movies come close. John Cusack and Minnie Driver have decent chemistry in "Grosse Pointe Blank." But it's rare.

So when I go to see a romantic comedy, I expect to see good, witty dialogue. I want to be inspired to laugh -- to really laugh -- often. I want dialogue that seems authentic; that sounds like something people might actually say in real life. But at the same time, I want it to be smart and sharp (ie sarcasm is greatly appreciated).

On that count, I think "Must Love Dogs" does very well. Maybe I watch too much TV and movies and have a skewed view of what my world is like, or maybe I have unusually funny friends. But the dialogue I was hearing seemed like what I would hear when hanging out with my friends. Rough, quick, funny, and often a little bitter. From that standpoint, I found the movie not only funny, but also believable.

That said, the plot is terrible, even for a romantic comedy. It looks like either they had a rough edit that was four hours long and had to cut it down at the expense of character development and establishment of a basic, sensible plot, or they wrote the first 80 minutes and then realized that they needed to finish this film up somehow, and fast. But flaws aside, it's a solid movie, and well worth seeing. But I'd advise waiting for video rather than paying $10 to see it in the theater.

Random Sports Thoughts

The NBA released the 2005-2006 schedule today. Looking over the schedule, it's not a huge surprise. Tons of TV attention for teams like Denver that will probably end up underperforming but have "popular" players. Of course, tons of dates for the Lakers (after all, the whole country wants to see Phil and Kobe back together *bleech*), the Cavs (this year, the "chosen one" might actually make the playoffs), the Heat (ok, they're actually a legit team), and the Suns (another legit, but overhyped, team).

I was happy to see that the Pistons will, by my count, make 19 appearances on national TV (ESPN, ABC, and TNT). Adding games vs. the Knicks and Nets that I should be able to see on local TV here, I should be able to see around a quarter of their season, if everything works out well. It's about time that the L gives some respect to the Eastern Conference champion from the last two seasons.

Of course, in my opinion, the real problem is that the national TV schedule is set in stone before the season begins. While that gives me, as a fan, something to anticipate, it also leads to a ton of meaningless matchups clogging the airwaves in February, March, and April. At the beginning of last season, Denver vs. Minnesota in March would have looked like a great matchup. By the time it appeared on ESPN, it was a game between two non-marquee teams.

The television schedule up through the All-Star break should be set at the start of the season, and then around the same time that All-Star rosters are finalized, the TV slate for the second half of the year should be established. By that time, it's much more clear which teams are playing well and which teams will be involved in interesting games come the end of March or the beginning of April.

In other news, the Red Wings signed goalie Chris Osgood for a second go-round yesterday. Osgood wore the winged wheel from 1993 to 2001. He backstopped the team to the Stanley Cup in 1998, but was blamed for the playoff collapses in 1999 and 2000.

Playing goalie in Detroit is a tough job. It's the one place on the ice where Detroit fans, rabid even by hockey standards, focus the most attention. If the goalie is successful, they're a hero. If they're perceived as blowing games, everyone calls for their head. Osgood saw both the highs and the lows of this during his last time in Detroit. He is a good goaltender who bore far too much blame for failure by the whole team. Hopefully, this stint in Hockeytown will finish on a happier note.

Of course, it would help if Detroit fans would have more realistic expectations. Quarterbacks for the Lions and Goalies for the Wings are subject to a crazy amount of pressure. Before they show anything, they are anointed the next savior to lead the team to the promised land. With such high standards, they are almost destined to fail, and when they do, they are destroyed by the fans, whether or not they were at fault for the failure.

So best of luck, Chris. You'll need it.

Monday, August 08, 2005

Waste of Space

I just checked my school email, and as the page was reloading, the first thing I saw was the yellow warning that I was using 17 mb of my 20 mb storage limit. Seeing as I was nowhere close to the limit (last I knew), I was surprised.

Turned out that I had one very large email -- 5.5 mb to be exact. It was from our career services office, and contained a reception invitation from a large, well-known New York law firm (*ahem* Skadden). fn1. I just had to see what was so special about this invitation to justify 5.5 mb, so I opened it up.

It was a hideously ugly PowerPoint slide, converted into PDF format. Nothing special. I've see junior high students create PowerPoint slides that are more interesting and pleasing to the eye. It was a terrible waste of space, and our career services people should be ashamed of insulting us and clogging our inboxes by forwarding it to us. It was absolutely unnecessary (a simple email conveying the same information would have worked just fine), and for people who were near their inbox limit, such a large file could delay or prevent them from receiving important mail.

I'm not sure who's stupider in this situation: Skadden, for creating such a terrible invitation; the career services office, for forwarding it on to us; or me, for wasting my time looking at the email in the first place.

1. When I say "well-known," I mean "well-known for abusing its associates like rented mules." No, I am not kidding.

Food Fest

Last night, J1 and I went to Monsoon, a Vietnamese restaurant on the UWS, for dinner with one of our friends, a male who is not named in the list of characters. So we'll call him Boy. Other of our friends, such as K1, were also at the restaurant. However, they declined to sit and eat with us because that's just what kind of people they are. hehehe.

Anyway, we ordered so much food. We were doing family-style, so we started out with three entrees. But apparently Boy, who had spent the day at the beach, had worked up an appetite in the sun. So we ordered another entree. Then another one. He and I were putting away the food like Ethopian children who hijacked a food truck. It was all SO incredibly good though. Monsoon is such a solid restaurant. The food is so flavorful, it is healthy, and it is relatively cheap. The bamboo rice was a highlight, as was the lemongrass tofu.

J1 didn't eat that much food, so I think between us Boy and I ate at least two entrees each. And then, we went to Edgar's Cafe for dessert. Yeah, it was a food fest all right. By the way, at Edgar's, Boy got the coconut sorbetto. It was excellent, and came served in half a pineapple. I would highly recommend it.

But the real point of this post, beyond talking about all the food we ate, is to talk about K1, who is really an awesome person. And by awesome, I mean totally sweet. Anyway, apparently she has been told that she's not a very nice person, and that being in New York has made her even less nice. I strongly dispute this proposition. I think she is a sweet, caring person who is an excellent friend. She may have some rough edges, but so do many of us. Don't mistake the defense of oneself with being mean, that's all I have to say.

And hey, you're nicer than people who make passive-aggressive, extremely bitchy comments to people at dinner. No, I'm not going to go into details, but it's quite the funny story.

Friday, August 05, 2005

Forever blowing bubbles

Every summer, hundreds of law students descend on New York law firms for summer camp, otherwise known as summer clerkships. They'll consume thousands of excess calories at daily four-star lunches, enjoy Broadway shows, go golfing with partners, take long coffee breaks, attend cocktail hours and dinner parties, be paid healthy amounts of money, and even occasonally do some work.

Every summer, another parallel phenomon occurs: many summer associates become "that summer." The intern who gets too drunk at a party and makes a pass at a partner (or a partner's daughter), says something stupid in a meeting with clients, becomes known for sleeping in their office after lunch, or inadvertently sends out an assinine email to the entire firm. These summers are the stuff legends are made of, and their stories are passed down (and embellished) through the years.

This summer in New York, the most notorious story involves a girl who became very drunk while at an event at Chelsea Piers, stripped down to her underwear, and jumped in the Hudson River for a swim.

No summer at my firm has yet become "that summer." It's a pretty low-key class, and no one has made any waves or done anything too stupid. One guy, however, obviously wants to change that.

We're sitting in a tax department breakfast this morning. There's like eight people there. SummerJ is sitting across the conference table from me. Now SummerJ is already known as a bit of a weird dude. He is mostly notable for wearing a suit to work every day and saying slightly off-kilter stuff in meetings.

I look over and notice that he's not only chewing gum, but he just blew a small bubble. I am surprised. This is not normal behavior for a corporate meeting. But his head was turned away, so it wasn't that noticeable, and I thought that maybe it was an accident. But then, he's turned directly toward the group and blows a large bubble, pops it, then does it again. There are not words to describe how surprised and disgusted I was.

Talk about making a tushie of yourself in front of a room full of tax people. Not to mention -- these are tax people. It's not like they're all laid back and walking around with their d*cks hanging out of their pants. They're a little stiff. I don't imagine most of them even know how to blow a gum bubble, let alone chew chewing gum.

Yup, we've got a candidate for "that summer." We'll see how it plays out.

And the fetishes just keep getting weirder

Ok, so you all thought that the weirdos visiting BRY after doing Yahoo searches for "forearm fetish" sites were a little weird. Well, the list of fetishes just got weirder.

On July 25, someone in Seattle came to Black Red Yellow looking for information on "styrofoam fetishes." Can I just say WTF?? Can someone please describe to me how in the hell you can have a fetish for styrofoam? Wait. Check that. I'd rather not know.

I mean, a forearm fetish is strange. I don't really understand why you would become sexually obsessed with forearms when there are perfectly normal body parts, such as feet or armpits, to become obsessed with. fn1. But that's beside the point. I can see how, I suppose, one could decide that forearms are really HOTT. But where does a love of styrofoam come from? I really don't see anything sexy about styrofoam. I suppose that if you got a lot of mail order packages it would be a convenient fetish because every time you got a package you'd feel all attracted to it. But I just to understand where the sexiness comes in.

People are crazy, I say. Crazy!

1. Or even -- gasp -- how about becoming sexually obsessed with reproductive organs? Or is that too normal for all you weirdos out there?

Thursday, August 04, 2005

My new least favorite airport

The title goes to Boston's Logan International Airport. The setup is terrible.

I flew through Boston on my way back from San Fran last weekend. Although I was ticketed through United, my Boston-LGA leg was on the USAir shuttle. Because of the way Boston is set up, you are forced to exit one terminal and walk all the way to another terminal to get on a USAir flight.

There's no AirTrain or any sort of shuttle. You just walk .75 miles or so through endless walkways and halls. How backwards is that?

What's more, because you exited one terminal, you have to go through security at the next terminal. As regular readers know, airport security is a constant challenge for me. The last thing I need is to be forced to go through security a second time. Even America's worst-designed airport, Washington Dulles -- the airport featuring transport vehicles that look like rejected props from a low-budget 1960s alien film -- allows passengers to move from terminal to terminal without going through security a second time.

But when I finally arrived at the proper terminal, the design flaws became even more evident. I kept looking for USAir and could not find it. Eventually, I saw signs pointing me to the outside door. Outside the door and across the street is a parking garage. Surely I didn't need to go there.

Oh, of course I did. You exit the terminal, cross a road (risking your life in the face of speeding taxicabs), walk through a parking garage, cross another road, and finally are in the USAir terminal. I have never seen a worse setup in my life.

When I finally found the USAir check-in counter, there was a sign that said, "If you are flying the shuttle to Washington DCA or New York LGA, please go to the other end of the terminal." Clearly, it would be too much work to put such a sign at the door so that one didn't have to do all kinds of back-tracking.

Moral of the story: if you can avoid flying through BOS, absolutely do so. Your flying life will be at least 20% better as a result.

The most depressing ritual

Today, I went to my first law firm farewell event, for an associate in my current department who is leaving after four years with the firm. It was one of the most uncomfortable, depressing events I have witnessed since my last funeral.

Imagine a windowless conference room, illuminated by harsh fluorescent lights. On the table at the side sit catering trays filled with cheese, crackers, fresh fruit, and cookies. It would look like the buffet for any afternoon meeting but for the seven bottles of champagne chilling on ice and the cake inscribed "Good Luck [Insert Name Here]."

Associates and a few partners start to drift in. They joke about whether the cake will be chocolate or strawberry, and make veiled references to the last going-away party.

Finally, after a critical mass has assembled, the extremely awkward practice group head stands up and makes a speech about how the departing associate was a good guy who was a pleasure to work with. The praise seemed incredibly forced, as if the partner didn't really mean anything that was being said.

People's eyes were shifting away. The partner stared at the associate, as if he expected a speech.

"Uh, thanks. It's been great working here. I've learned a lot, and uh....I will...uh....miss it."

Corks popped, and the cake was cut. Out came the requisite Tiffany's bag -- the farewell present. The associate unwrapped the layers of bubble wrap and tissue paper to discover a crystal box with the firm name engraved on the bottom. He stared at it with confusion and disinterest, as if someone had wrapped up a copy of amNewYork as his farewell gift.

"What is it?" people asked. "Um, it's a pot to uh...put stuff in," he stammered.

"It's a pot for your pot. For your stash," one of the partners helpfully added. Everyone was silent and uncomfortable.

Soon, people started to slip out of the room. Work called, after all. Departing colleagues can only detract from billable hours for a limited time.

After a few minutes, there were only three or four people. The table was still covered with food -- the catering trays looked almost untouched. Six champagne bottles still sat on ice. Chunks of cake had been removed, obscuring the associate's name. The associate, and his Tiffany box, were about to move on to another chapter of life, after four years and thousands of hours in the office.

"This is the way world ends. Not with a bang but with a whimper."

Quote of the Day

Talking to my mom last night, and telling her about running the marathon. I was saying that I took it easy to avoid hurting myself. Her response:
"That's good. You don't have to crucify yourself. Jesus already did that for you."

I'm not sure exactly what this means, and I'm not even sure I want to unpack the potential meanings.

Incompetence Rewarded

The Detroit Lions just agreed to a contract extension for General Manager Matt Millen. Millen, who is entering his fifth year of a five-year contract, will be on the job for an additional five years.

The highlights of the Millen era:
- An overall record of 16-48. (That's a .250 winning percentage, folks!)
- An NFL-record 24-game road losing streak. For THREE years, the lions never won a game on the road.
- Calling former Detroit receiver Johnny Morton a faggot and labeling an unnamed Lion "a devout coward" on Chicago talk radio.

And for this, Millen gets another five years to run the Lions into the ground. Of course, the excuse is that the team is making "progress." Over Millen's four years, their records have been 2-14, 3-13, 5-11, and 6-10. So basically, he set the bar so low his first two years that anything looks good in comparison. In today's NFL, a team can easily add five to six wins in a year by smart moves in the free agency market. Millen seems incapable of making such moves.

Owner William Clay Ford is known for being intensely loyal to his employees. He wonders why his team has won one playoff game in the last 50 years. I would say it's because he is loyal to incompetent people, and rewards that incompetence with even more time to screw up the team.

Tuesday, August 02, 2005

Well, I did always want to run a marathon in the worst way...

And so, with that bad -- and rather tired (much like my legs) -- joke, the story of my running of the San Francisco Marathon, presented by Runner's World (I don't think I saw a sign about the marathon all weekend without the "presented by Runner's World" tag).

Training
When I talk about running a marathon in the worst way, this is what I'm talking about. I trained in February and March, but once I started hitting 25 miles a week or so, I was getting too many leg/foot problems, so I pretty much stopped running. Until July 17:

Sunday: 1.5 miles (but it was 100 degrees, which has to count for something)
Monday: 2 miles
Wednesday: 3 miles
Friday: 5 miles
Sunday: 12 miles
Tuesday: 2 miles
Thursday: 3 miles (skipped -- figured I might as well save my legs)
Saturday: 1.5 miles (skipped -- same reason as above)
Sunday: run marathon

In my defense, I did work up to a long run, and then I tapered. It was just marathon training in fast-forward, that's all.

Preparation
Saturday night, I carefully laid out my clothes for the next day. I pinned my bib to my shirt, attached my timing chip to my shoe, and called a cab to schedule a pickup for the next morning. fn1. I crafted a mini-ziploc bag for my money/id card out of a big ziploc bag and a lot of scotch tape. I set two alarms for 3:30 and went to bed around 10:30.

Then, I couldn't sleep. I was nervous about the race, about my lack of preparation, and about my potential to pass out at mile 16 and feeling like a complete failure. I was afraid my legs, or my lungs, or my mind, would give out too soon. Finally, I slept, but fitfully.

I was up with a start when my alarms went off. I was wide awake instantly. I showered and put on my contacts, then started with the real race prep. Vaseline was applied to various areas down below to prevent chafing. I tried to use Liquid Skin to prevent more damage to the mostly-recovered right heel blister from my long run the week before. It wouldn't dry, so I wiped it off and put on a Band-Aid instead. After applying Vaseline to my feet to minimize other blisters, my socks and shoes went on.

Then, it was time to tape up my nips to prevent a repeat of the painful chafing from my long run. However, my veritable thicket of chest hair posed a problem, as the first band-aid fell off as soon as I applied it. I had little choice but to pull out the razor and shave band-aid sized strips around the nips. fn2. Of course, with my luck, I was suffering from some THO and managed to nick my right nip with the razor. Not enough that it bled, but just enough that it felt chafed. Which,when you think about it, kind of defeats the idea of putting on band-aids to prevent chafing.

Finally having protected my man boobies, I put on my shirt and did my hair. Yes, of course I put wax in my hair. If you're going to run a marathon as slow as I was about to, you at least better look good running the marathon, ya know?

And then, I was off. The cab was quick. Not surprisingly, the streets of San Francisco were pretty deserted at 4:45 am. Pulling up near the Embarcadero, I encountered my first serious problem of the morning (nipple nicking excepted). I had $58 cash (a 50, a 5, and three 1s) and a credit card with me. fn3. I was going to give the cabbie $21. It was his first run of the day, so he had no change -- nothing but a wad of 1s. He couldn't take credit cards. I was pretty near screwed...

Until someone even more desperate than me came to my rescue. A runner came up, and asked if the cabbie could get him to the Castro and back in 20 minutes. Dude must have forgotten his timing chip, because I can think of no other reason he would be so desperate to get back home before the race. He knew my situation, and knew that my cabbie was not going to be available until it was straightened out. He really needed a cab. So he said, "Listen, I'll pay this guy's fare if you just get me to the Castro and back asap." I thanked him profusely, gave him the $8 of small bills I had, and wished him luck. Crisis averted.

I stretched a little, hit the porta-john (fortunately, it was my last pit stop until after I got home from the race), checked my sweats, and got a cup of water. As I made my way to the starting line, I ended up in a conversation with a nice Japanese gentleman, who was running the half. Of course, he had already done two marathons this year, and twenty-some in his life, so he was just here to run the Golden Gate. I was feeling rather embarrassed that this guy more than twice my age could easily outpace me. I'm such a slacker.

I found my starting pen and was united with my pace group and pace group leader, Dick. Dick was a tall, white-haired man with glasses who could probably be my grandfather. Ok, I'm getting older. He's probably not old enough to be my grandfather. But he had to be north of 65. Regardless, he was going to lead us for the first 13.1 at a pace to finish in 4:30. Yeah, I wanted to run in under 4:00. But I had to be reasonable. I was going to be lucky to finish. 4:30 seemed like something I could do without burning out at mile 15.

I had butterflies as the count-down to the start began. It's the moment of truth....there's no more training, stretching, or planning you can do. And I told myself, in the old cliche, "There is no try. Only do." It was a phrase I would repeat often over the next few hours.

The Race
Starting: At 5:20, the starting gun (which wasn't really a gun at all -- who are we kidding, this is San Fran, the most liberal large city in the country. I'm surprised they didn't light a starting hash pipe or something) went off and the elite runners took off in front of us. At 5:27, our pen (pen 3) was released.

We were well behind the starting line, and so the first couple minutes were more of a shuffle than a run. People were whooping and hollering, but I was conserving my breath. I needed all my energy for other purposes. Finally, we crossed the starting mats and broke out into a slow jog.

Overall, we were pacing for 10:17 miles. However, because we were running using the Galloway method, our runs were at about a 9:40 pace. fn4. It was an easy gait -- it was almost too slow, as I felt like I was having to check my stride too much. Our first walk break came so soon. It was a nice surprise -- it's like you hardly work and you already get a break. Kind of like being a summer associate in a law firm, except with less food and more physical exertion.

Mile 1: My right foot is acting up. It wasn't exactly hurting. I'm striking too much on my forefoot and not enough on my heel. Probably a subconscious desire to avoid aggravating my blister-prone right heel, but it's making my foot feel stiff and putting too much pressure on my right knee. Seems like it may be a problem later in the race.

I run past two women wearing black-and-white striped inmates outfits. Escapees from Alcatraz, I assume.

Mile 3: The first water station is a mess. The pack is too clustered right now, and they volunteers can't keep up. Runners are running into each other, there is no water, and when I finally get a cup it has about two ounces of water. I'm separated from my pace group, and have no idea how far ahead they are.

Now, the first real hill. It's an extremely steep climb -- you could almost have stairs. I'm having no problem climbing it -- it's not much steeper than West End Ave. coming down from 95th to 96th St. The other people who are making it impossible to move forward quickly are a difficulty, but that's life in a large race.

I catch up with my pace group. Dick and the gang are chugging along like well-oiled machines.

Mile 4: An extremely hot female police officer is standing by her squad car, holding up a sign in support of the SFPD team. Wow. I didn't know they made cops like that. Must have been someone like her who inspired RHCP's "Sir Psycho Sexy." fn5.

Mile 5: Now, the real hills begin. 120 feet of elevation over .2 miles. Dick is telling us to own the hill. I am owning the hill. I'm imposing my will on this hill, and the hill is enjoying it. That's what I tell myself over and over.

At the top, we pass the marker for mile 5. I'm still feeling fresh, and almost 20% of the trip is over.

Mile 6: Another hill, much more mild, as we climb onto the Golden Gate Bridge. It's cool and very misty. The bridge towers aren't even visible until we get under them.

Runner traffic on the bridge is terrible. Everyone's bumping and grinding like it's Saturday night at Pretty Boys n Thugs.

Mile 9: We've run out over the bridge, looped around Point Vista (or some other such originally-named view area) and are headed back toward SF. I look at my yellow pace team wristband, which has cumulative pace time for each mile split. It's so wet, with the mist, and my sweat, that the ink-jetted numbers are almost totally obscured in a mess of blue and red. All I can see is the large numbers at the bottom: 4:30. Eyes on the prize.

Mile 10: This seems like a milestone. I'm still feeling fine, still staying with the pace, and we've run ten miles.

Our group seems to be losing people. I don't know if they're outrunning us or dropping back from us.

Mile 11-12: A lot of hills, heading from the Presidio into Golden Gate Park. I'm still owning them though, easily outpacing my group on most of the hills by virtue of using a longer stride. That allows me to take it easier on the downhill side, hopefully saving some pounding on my knees.


Mile 13.1: We pass the halfway point in 2:15:45. A bit slow, but we had a lot of traffic and some brutal hills to deal with in the first half. Dick is relieved by Leslie, our second-half pace leader.

Leslie is probably in her early 30s. She's run 16 marathons in the past eight years. She usually runs around 3:40s, but she had a baby 10 months ago. She had to keep running to "get her butt in shape," in her own words. Now by virtue of her recent pregnancy, she's at a mere 4:30 pace. Once again, I feel like an incredible slacker.

I'm into uncharted territory now, as I'm beyond the longest run I've ever done. But I'm still feeling ok. No, more than ok. Good. I feel as good as I did at mile 3. I'm wondering if I should have joined the 4:10 or 4:20 pace group, and if I'm going to have enough juice to kick it up a notch around mile 24...maybe I can get closer to 4:25 than 4:30.

Mile 14: Coming around a turn just before the mile 14 marker, loudspeakers are set up, blasting Beck's "Devil's Haircut." Great, kicking tune.

Mile 15: After a water station, I start to hear the strains of Pearl Jam's "Alive." Now I can't say that I have a favorite PJ song -- that's like asking a parent to pick their favorite child. But "Alive" is right up there. fn6. Hearing it gives me a kick, and inspiration, especially the chorus: "I'm still alive." I am still alive. My legs are still alive. My body is still alive. A little more than ten miles to go and I'm still alive!

The water station just before mile 16 was sponsored by a local bar, which was also handing out beer. Just what everyone needs: some carbs -- and alcohol -- in the middle of their marathon.

Miles 16-18: We're running loops in Golden Gate Park. Hilly loops. The hills are getting tougher. They may be alive with the sounds of music, but my legs are dead with the sounds of lactic acid.


I just wanted to get to mile 18 and be feeling ok. I'm here now, but suddenly realizing that I still have eight miles to go. That's kind of a lot. I tell myself, "There is no try. Only do." Next goal: Make it to mile 20. That's a nice round number.

Mile 19: A family is celebrating some Mexican lady's 100th birthday by passing out orange slices. My orange slice tastes mighty good. Believe me folks, that gesture was much appreciated.

Leslie is a great coach, I must say. She's perky and yells encouragement to us constantly. She tells us we're looking great. She's lying, but it's a nice lie for her to tell. We're also on pace, she says. In fact, we're "so on pace if we were any more on pace we'd be on pace." I'm not sure what that means, but hey, I'm still in line to finish at 4:30. But Leslie's following seems to be getting smaller. We've picked up a few people since mile 13 -- people who were running faster but now join in with us for a 4:30. Our original group, however, is down to about four.

Mile 20: We're in the Haight now. A guy is standing by the course holding up a neon-green posterboard reading "Today, You are all Kenyans." It's a nice thought. I'd settle for being a slow Kenyan.

We cross mile 20, and the sun finally breaks through the clouds. Leslie yells out, "It's 9:00 am, you people have already run 20 miles, and you look great!" I shake my head. "That is just wrong," I say. "I should still be in bed at this time." Everyone laughs. Not too much, because we don't have much breath to laugh. Or because my joke wasn't funny. Something like that.

My hands, which have been going numb for a few miles now, are almost completely numb. My arms are tingling, and my shoulders are killing me.

Mile 21-22: More hills, and they're getting more and more difficult. Now, it's all I can do to keep up with the pace group going up them, and my knees are starting to feel it bad, meaning that the descent is no easier.


Leslie keeps telling us to keep our eyes on the top of the hill. "Look up! You run slower when you look at the ground." But I'm so tired that I can't spare the energy to lift my head high enough to see the top of the hill. So I stare at the pavement a few feet in front of me, hoping not to trip over a pothole. I try to tell myself that I'm dominating the hill, and the hill is going to smile and take it, but it doesn't seem so convincing anymore.

"There is no try. Only do." "I never try anything. I just do it. Wanna try me?" fn7. "I'm still alive." The motivational phrases sound like a cruel joke, but I'm still putting one foot in front of the other. I'm basically running so that I can have my one minute walking break. But somehow, the running intervals seem longer and longer. And after each walk break, it's more difficult to start running again.

The clouds are gone, revealing a glorious blue sky. The sun is beating down, and there is no shelter.

Mile 22: We cross an intersection lined with spectators. One of them is holding up a poster that says "My boyfriend is a runner." Yup, we're in SF.

Mile 23-25: My head is pounding. My Achilles tendons and calf muscles will hardly move. My knees are on fire. My right heel is clearly blistered. I can see what looks like dark wetness at the toes of my shoes. I can't tell if it's water or if I've lost a toenail and am bleeding. I doubt I could feel it if I had.

We pass mile marker 22 and slow to a walk to get water and Cytomax. fn8. But as the pace group speeds back up into a run, I keep walking. I can't run anymore. My body is spent. I'm afraid that if I keep running, I am going to pass out, or at least collapse and be unable to finish.

So with my head down, sun scorching me, I drink my water and walk. My walk is jerky because my legs are so stiff and tight. It's slow too, although I am passing a few other walkers. People keep running by me. I envy them. I wish I had the physical ability to run right now, but I just don't.

My head is swimming. I walk slowly, hoping that I don't pass out. The course is taking is through a deserted, god-forsaken section of SF, filled with warehouses and industrial buildings. There are not spectators, and there certainly isn't scenery. Just other runners, me, and the hot sun.

I think that I'll walk mile 23, then see if I can run 24, walk 25, then run the last 1.2. Somehow, though, I miss marker 23. I keep walking. This seems like the longest mile ever. Either I missed the mile marker, or I'm never going to finish this marathon. When I started walking, I still had 4.2 miles to go. Two weeks ago, I could hardly run 4 miles without stopping. Now, four miles stood between me and the finish line.

In preparation for the marathon, the SFPD had put up a number of "No Stopping" signs along the streets making up the course. This became a personal command for me. No stopping. Despite my desire to sit on the curb and put my head in my hands, I could not stop. The signs told me I couldn't. I keep walking.

Somewhere along the way, Dick, our intrepid pace leader, shuffled past me. He had dropped off the pace somewhere in the second half, but with tortoise and hare justice, he's still going, and I'm not.

Finally, I pass the mile 24 marker, and I realize that I missed the marker for 23. Only 2.2 miles to go now. I decide to walk to mile 25, then try to run the rest of the way in.

The course was approaching SBC Park, site of many a steroid-aided Barry Bonds home run. In front of the stadium there's another DJ, blasting The Who's "I Can See for Miles." Roger Daltry might as well have been singing "I can run for miles and miles/I can run for miles and miles and miles." John Entwhistle's thundering bass-line provided rhythm to go on. Then, the CD got stuck: "I can see for mi-mi-mi-mi-mi-mi-mi-mi-mi-mi-mi-mi-mi-mi...." It seems rather appropriate, as I feel like I'm stuck in a loop of miles that seems like it will never end.

Walking between the stadium and the bay, I'm almost to the mile 25 marker when the 4:40 pace leader runs up next to me. It seems like a perfect time to start running again.

I had walked long enough that by now I feel ok. I'm closing in on the end -- I could taste it. "No Stopping" seemed like a friendly reminder now.


Finally, there are spectators. Both sides of the road lined with cheering people, telling us we're almost there. It's the extra boost we need. I'm gaining speed now. We're closing in on mile 26 -- I start to sprint.


I see the guy who passed me earlier with the Dodge symbol tattooed on his shoulder. (Who the hell gets the symbol of an automaker, particularly Dodge, tattooed on themselves??) No way is Dodge man going to beat me. I pass him.

I can't really think about anything, see anything, feel anything. All I know is the sound of my shoes slapping the pavement and my chest heaving as I run for the finish. From somewhere, I find an extra store of energy to push myself even faster. I can see the finish line. I think people are yelling and cheering, but it doesn't register.

I can see the timing mats at the finish line. I'm straining for them.


Then, I'm over. I hear the timing system beep as it registers my time. I'm finished. It's over. I've done it.



1. San Francisco's public transportation system, I've discovered, is virtually useless. It's operating hours are similar to the hours banks are open (and no, I'm not talking about I-bankers) and stations aren't exactly everywhere.

2. I was shocked by how freaking much chest hair I actually have. I had to clean the razor every two seconds. The sink was carpeted with the hair. And this was from shaving a total of three to four square inches.

3. I am really annoyed with Chase for their habit of putting 50s in their ATMs. 50s are useless in most contexts. The dude at the bodega is pissed if you give him a 20. He certainly doesn't want a 50. Same with cabbies, most of the time. And by 50, I mean 50 dollar bills. I don't mean Fitty Cent, S4's favorite musician.

4. The "Galloway Method" is a system of long-distance running developed and popularized by former Olympian Jeff Galloway. It is designed for slower runners (ie - people running over 3:20s or so), not elite athletes. The idea is that by taking walking breaks allows the body to rest and allows oxygen to flow to the legs, preventing muscle fatigue from setting in as soon. Also, because ones walking pace is not too much slower than the running pace at slower speeds, one does not lose too much time by taking the walk breaks. So in short, the system is designed to allow you to reach your time goals with less risk of fatigue. We were running for 6 minutes, then walking for 1 minute.

5. As this is a family website, I'll let you find lyrics to that song on your own
.

6. Ever since seeing them live for the first time in Cleveland, I get goose bumps almost every time I hear that song. The guitar solo takes me back to that night in Cleveland, already an emotional night, and then the power of Alive. The single white spotlight shining down on Mike, making his dyed-blond hair glow like a halo. Head thrown back, wailing away on his battered brown-sunburst Strat. (Note: if you ever are watching PJ and see the tech give McCready that Strat, prepare to get your ass rocked. It seems to be his favorite axe for amazing solos.) The crowd chanting "Yeah!" and pumping their fist on every beat, thinking that if we just yelled loud enough, we could make this moment last forever. And Mike doing his best to make it last forever, extending the solo in improbable ways to unfathomable lengths. Yeah, I like "Alive."

7. White Zombie, "Thunderkiss 69"

8. Cytomax is like Gatorade or Powerade, except twice as good. It's not like sweet syrup, and it's actually low in sugar.

Um, hello first year of law school?

I just got a call from an attorney who gave me an assignment this morning. I am a little dismayed by the knowledge level he displayed.

My assignment was to look at a very specific provision of a particular IRS Revenue Procedure (RevProc) to see if it was still "good law." fn1.

A little background: Congress writes a law. It's passed by Congress and signed by the President, then codified in the United States Code (U.S.C.). It is typically long, extremely boring, and seems painfully detailed.

However, it's usually not detailed enough, so executive departments (in the case of tax laws, the Department of Treasury), issue regulations about how the law is to be interpreted/applied. This is what we call administrative law, and is recorded in the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). These regulations are even more boring and extreme in their detail.

Even this, however, is not enough for the IRS. They issued RevProcs, which detail exactly how the regulations in the C.F.R. should be applied. fn2.

So my assignment was to look at a very discrete sub-part of the most detailed layer of rules (RevProcs) and see if anything had superseded it in the past 45 years.

The documents I was given to examine (mostly other RevProcs, and a couple cases) turned out not to be relevant. Some of them dealt with other sections of the RevProc in question, others dealt with entirely different sections of the C.F.R.

So I sent an email detailing this information to the attorney. I didn't just say "The section in question is still good law," because I knew he'd want more details. So I noted why the documents I had examined didn't change the sub-section of interest to him.

Five minutes later, I receive a call. "I don't understand this email. What is this C.F.R. and what does it have to do with anything?" Which of course left me in the very uncomfortable position of trying to explain what the C.F.R. is (something which I'm not sure how any litigator who has been practicing for 25 years does not know -- I learned about it in my first semester of law school) without sounding like a condescending jackass.

1. This RevProc was issued in 1960. I needed to see if any later RevProcs or court cases had superseded the rule. If not, it is still "good law" and can be used in our brief.

2. And you wonder why the government employs so many people. Just writing rules about rules about rules is pretty time consuming, not to mention that you have to ensure that everyone is complying with these multiple layers of rules.


Note: Sorry, I realize that this extremely long anecdote was probably of no interest to anyone other than myself. It is, quite likely, more engaging than a RevProc, but probably not extensively so. My apologies.