Thursday, June 30, 2005

Time to release confidential documents

Now that one of their reporters is threatened with jail time for refusing to testify to a grand jury in the Valerie Plame leak case, Time magazine has decided to hand over papers regarding reporter Matthew Cooper's confidential sources. Read more at Yahoo! News. This will most likely help Cooper avoid imprisonment, but at what cost?

This is a difficult case. On one hand, Cooper and Judith Miller -- a reporter for the New York Times -- clearly seem to be scapegoats in this case. They never went public with the information that they collected from their sources. Yet Robert Novak, the columnist who actually decided to jeopardize U.S. counterintelligence efforts and kill the career of a C.I.A. covert operative by releasing her name, isn't being forced to testify. If anyone should be facing jail time, it's him. Instead, the attention is focused on two reporters who decided not to out Plame.

For that reason alone, I object to the pressure on Cooper and Miller. But beyond that, I believe strongly in the value of anonymous sources for journalists. In many cases, it is the only way to get the vital facts about important, but politically sensitive, situations. The Supreme Court's refusal to hear Cooper and Miller's appeal of the contempt ruling against them strikes a serious blow to the ability of the press to obtain this important information but sources who wouldn't dare to be named.

On the other hand, this is a unique case. You have a situation where the name of a C.I.A. operative was leaked, and reported, in the press. That alone is a major security breach, particularly in a time when intelligence operations are viewed as a vital part of the fight against terrorism. Even more disturbing is that one must question whether the leak was motivated by politics, and an attempt to punish Plame's husband for failing to follow the Bush Administration's story on Iraq. It is vitally important that the person responsible for the leak is identified, and their motive is discovered, so that the offender can be punished and future leaks can possibly be prevented.

However, I don't think it's appropriate to solve one problem by creating another. An effective press which can obtain relevant information is vital to the functioning of our democracy. While the identify of the Plame leaker needs to be discovered, forcing it out of Cooper and Miller is the wrong way to do it. Maybe they should start with Bob Novak, who actually published the information.

Walk much?

Since I would laugh and probably post about this if it happened to anyone else, I'll share the joy with the rest of you and let you laugh at me.

I was going down to the cafeteria to get breakfast and in the hallway I saw another summer who I hadn't talked to in awhile. We were walking along talking, so of course I wasn't paying attention to where I was going.

There was a slight jog in the wall, which I managed to run into full force with my shoulder, sending me staggering back and to the side. Pretty funny, eh? I can't even walk down a hallway competently.

Update:
My clumsiness continues.

I am having a constant issue with opening doors (pushing when I should be pulling, and pulling when I should be pushing). In addition, I tripped on the subway stairs coming back from lunch. Fortunately, I have fast reflexes precisely for these situations, and was able to catch myself.

Wednesday, June 29, 2005

And lawyers wonder why they're despised...

Email from one of A4's law school friends, summering at another firm. The topic, of course, was summer lunches:

We haven't been anywhere good lately. We even had to eat ordered-in pizza yesterday. Sure, they said that the extra money was being donated to Meals on Wheels, but where was I when that decision was being made?

Brief NBA Draft Thoughts

Looking over the results from last night's NBA draft...

The Pistons picked up Cincinnati's Jason Maxiell, a 6-7 PF known for tough defense. Not a surprise -- most of Cincy's players are tough, as in thuggish. He should be a good fit for Detroit, as he is a great shot-blocker and willing to do the little things to help the team win. Besides, he has freakish length (a 7-3 wingspan, which makes him longer than Tayshaun Prince), which will make up for the fact that he's undersized for a PF. Besides, being undersized never hurt Ben Wallace.

I think the Pistons did as well as could be expected with the 26th pick. Of course, I was kind of hoping for Michigan State's Alan Anderson, who I think is a legit four-position player in the mold of Prince, but Anderson went undrafted.

Random thoughts:
Four members of UNC's national title team were picked in the first 14 picks. That's impressive.

Everyone said this was the "year of the point guard," but only six of the top 30 picks were PGs. That's 1/5th of the picks, which is what you would expect given that there are five positions in basketball. Sure, PGs were taken in the 3-4-5 spots, which is unusual. But they were the only points taken in the top 20.

Nice move by the Jazz, trading up with Portland to snag Illinois' Deron Williams in the third spot. The Jazz need a floor leader, and Williams is tough as nails and knows how to run a team.

On one hand, I see what Charlotte is trying to do by drafting PG Raymond Felton and PF Sean May, both out of Carolina. (Ok, the first think they're trying to do is sell tickets, but beyond that...) Since they already have Emeka Okafor as a center, they're trying to build around him. The problem with that is that Okafor is undersized for an NBA center (only 6-10), and is really more of a PF. May isn't "undersized" for a PF, but he's certainly not extremely large at 6-9. It seems that the Bobcats are going to end up with a bunch of very similar players, and no true center.

I realize that Portland thinks prep-to-pro (or more accurately, playground-to-pro) PG Sebastian Telfaire is their floor general of the future. (Personally, I think he's rather overrated, and it's possible the Blazers do to. Why else would they pick GaTech's Jarret Jack?) So to "build" on that foundation, they pick prep SG Martell Webster. This is a team that has struggled for years with chemistry and maturity issues. Adding yet another 18-year-old straight out of high school to the roster is not going to take care of those problems.

The Knicks finally got a true center in Channing Frye. But on the same day, GM Isiah Thomas shipped out Kurt Thomas (good move) in exchange for Quentin Richardson. Which is great and all, but do the Knicks really need another swingman? The entire team is between 6-6 and 6-9, somewhat athletic, and has no defined position. I don't think Richardson solves that problem.

The Lakers pick up a high school center with the 10th pick. With all the holes that team has, it seems that there might have been one or two players available at 10 who could contribute immediately and aren't project players that might start contributing five years from now. Not that I mind if the Lakers make stupid decisions....

Tuesday, June 28, 2005

Busy destroying the environment

Since I'm generally not busy doing much else, I've been taking an active role in harming the environment. I am currently on my fourth Styrofoam cup of the day. It's not that I intentionally use so many. It's just that if I'm close to the water machine and I want a drink, I am unmotivated to walk all the way back to my office, retrieve my empty cup from my desk, and walk back to fill it. So I grab a new cup, fill it with water, and then throw away the old one when I return to my office.

Of course, at least I'm not as bad as my office-mate. She destroyed a small forest on the deal she just finished. Their team was churning through drafts of their report so quickly that she had to borrow my recycling bin to hold all the extra paper. In a forest somewhere, the trees are still crying, with wind moaning softly through their branches.

Monday, June 27, 2005

Of Geekiness, Nerd-dom, and Being a Dork

The "Batman" post (footnote 1) reminded me of a conversation I was having Saturday afternoon at Crumbs with J2, K1, et al. I was sharing my theory (which I think has been established by many reputable experts) that being a geek, a nerd, and a dork are all very different things. Of these, being a geek is probably the best, followed closely by being a nerd. Becoming a dork, on the other hand, is a highly undesirable condition.

Definitions
Geek - One who is particularly interested in a particular area, particularly one related to technology/science. While a geek will probably have above-average knowledge or interest in an area which much of the population may ignore, that's not necessarily a huge problem. The general population watches Fear Factor, buys Ashlee Simpson albums, and can't locate Canada even if you spot them a map with an arrow pointing north of the U.S. So being out of step with them is not a big problem. It just means that the geek has developed a specialized interest in an area, and so long as they do not let it get out of hand (moving toward dorkiness), it will enrich the geek's life.

Nerd - One who is smart and has high levels of achievement in academic pursuits. Sure, it isn't going to get you any varsity letters (other than the terrible academic letters my high school handed out, which only TWO people wore on varsity jackets [fn1]) or many chicks, but ultimately, all your bases are belong to nerds. Exhibit A: The world's richest man, Bill Gates.

Dork - This is a generally annoying person. They may quite possibly be nerds or geeks as well -- these categories are not mutually exclusive -- but the dork takes things to another level. They generally have under-developed social skills and want to force their area of interest down your throat. They're the people who come to a party and pull out their Magic: The Gathering cards so that they can spar in an imaginary world with their dork friends. fn2. Being a dork is bad because unlike being a geek or a nerd, it means that other people don't want your company, which isn't too cool.

This whole conversation became particularly relevant for me because soon after this discussion of nerds, geeks, and dorks, I started telling a story which started out, "My high school physics teacher...." Everyone started laughing at me, and understandably so. (I will note that it was a damn good story, however, and very germane to the topic we were discussing at the time.)

This led me to a theory about stories that begin with "My high school physics teacher....", which also provides a great example of the difference between nerd, dork, and geek.

Stories recounting your interaction with your physics teacher are almost inevitably nerdy. They have something to do with some physics fact that you learned in high school. I mean, seriously... first sign that you are a nerd: you took physics in high school. Second sign you are a nerd: you remember and still talk about what you learned ten years ago in high school physics. Third sign you are a nerd: you believe these great physics theories are fodder for social conversations.

However, stories about your physics teacher might be geeky, as in "My high school physics teacher....took me to my first Star Trek convention." fn3.

There is also a chance such stories can be dorky. For example, one could say "My high school physics teacher....let me come hang out in his room during lunch sometimes when I got too bored of my regular lunchtime table in the library." That is the definition of "dork" right there. And that, my friends, is unfortunately a true story about me, proving that despite my efforts to the contrary, I am a dork.

How incredibly depressing, eh? Oh, you say you're laughing. Of course you are, you big bully!

1. It should be noted that of the two people who wore their academic varsity letters on varsity jackets, one was a good friend of mine who also happened to be an all-league soccer goalie and tennis player. He wore both his academic and athletic letters on his jacket, thereby earning him an exemption from extreme dorkiness. When you're as much of a badass as he was, you can put whatever the hell you want on your varsity jacket and it's ok.

2. Oh no. This isn't directed at a particular group of people in my high school. Not at all.

3. This is not the case with me. Unlike some people who will remain nameless (JLRS, I'm talking to you), I have never been to a Star Trek convention. However, had I wanted to go to such a gathering, my physics teacher would have been happy to take me along, as he went regularly.

Batman - the Prequel

I went to see Batman Begins with R2D2 and R3 on Saturday night. fn1. I highly recommend it. It is dark, as some people have noted. However, I think the darkness works well. The underlying message of confronting the things that frighten you most was particularly meaningful to me.

This was at the forefront of my mind yesterday as I finally washed my dishes, some of which had been languishing in my sink for a very long time. I don't want to say how long, because people would probably lose all respect for me if they knew how unclean I am. Let's just say that some of them had been there since the first Bush administration. fn2. To get even more specific, Howard Dean was still a viable presidential candidate when some of these dishes were first put in the sink.

People may ask why I left my dishes for that long. The obvious answer, of course, is laziness. But it's more than that. There was some kind of mental block preventing me from tackling those dishes. And the longer they sat there, the more afraid of them I became. So, inspired by Batman and impending return of J1, I finally took care of the dishes last night.

All of this made me think that if Bruce Wayne picked the bat as his "symbol," because it represented the things he feared most, then my symbol would have to be a dirty plate, crossed with a dirty fork and spoon. Which is a pretty terrible symbol. All this is just one more reason why I'm training to be a lawyer, and not a superhero. That and I don't think anyone wants to see me in black tights.

1. The main point of this post is to mention R2D2 in again, because it is so damn funny. If only I had friends named Charlie, Paul, and Otto who hung out with R2 and I. Then I could say that I went to the movie with R2D2 and C3PO (assuming that Charlie was my third C friend). That would just be sweet, unless the movie in question was Star Wars. Then people would just assume that my friends and I were big Star Wars geeks who dress up to go to movie premiers. And while my friends and I are generally big geeks, we aren't that kind of geeks.

2. No, not that Bush administration. I was 10 years old for that one. I mean W's first term.

My head's in the clouds

Literally.

I cannot see anything out my window but a vast sea of whiteness. It's like being wrapped in a shroud. Even the Trump Building, which is just across the street, is invisible.

If I look down toward the street, I can start seeing things around the 30th story or so. But up here, it's like we're on our own.

Pledging My Time

After about two months of procrastination, I finally got around to doing my preregistration for fall classes today. It seemed like a good idea, since PreReg closed at 5:00 pm today. Leave it to me to figure out some way to make things happen at the last minute.

The pleasant surprise was that I found a fair number of classes in which I had at least marginal interest. I had been avoiding the whole process because I really believed that there were no classes that I would want to take. But after working for half the summer, I have enough exposure to some areas of law/business that I know I want to learn more.

So I'm taking Deals, a Deals Workshop, a seminar about private investment funds, and an accounting/financial statements analysis class. I'm trying to decide between the Law and the Music Industry Seminar and Corporate Finance. (I figure I'll enroll for both and drop one during drops/adds.) Has anyone taken CorpFin with Fox? If so, was he good and was it a worthwhile class?

But the best part is the way the timing works out. I will have class from about 4:00 to 8:00 on Monday through Wednesday, and from 4:00 to 6:00 on Thursday. UNLESS I take CorpFin, in which case I'll have a morning class Tuesday through Thursday. Only having four days of classes and not starting until 4:00 pm would be perfect though.

Overhead on the street

Walking to lunch with my co-worker, we heard this conversation. (Ok, actually, she heard it and relayed it to me).

"Marriage is so f**king out right now in banking. I was engaged for awhile, just because I wanted to plant my seed, you know. But that didn't work out."

I don't think there's anything for me to add here.

Idle Hands

A4 and I are obviously very busy this morning, as this email exchange shows:

From: BRY
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 11:35 AM
To: A4
You doing anything for lunch? My lunch plans punked out on me.

From: A4
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 11:35 AM
To: BRY
Yeah, I’m going to Ise with some Finance people. Sorry (fn1)

From: BRY
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 11:36 AM
To: A4
Cool. Ise is the best restaurant in NYC!

From: A4
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 11:37 AM
To: BRY
You forgot about Bull Run, punk

From: BRY
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 11:38 AM
To: A4
Yeah, well you're forgetting about Applebees!

From: A4
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 11:40 AM
To: BRY
Well la dee da. I've been dying to go to Applebees all summer. My only chance so far was when I persuaded some associates to give up a Friday afternoon to go there, but then a partner called and I had to cancel.

From: BRY
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 11:41 AM
To: A4
Hahaha! I've gone to Applebees 3 times already. Those people who have been to Nobu 3 or 4 times think they're cool, but they've got nothing on me!

I realize I may be the only one who finds this exchange amusing/interesting. This is similar to Peter King's "Factoid of the Week That May Interest Only Me" in his Monday Morning Quarterback columns. fn2. This is the "Random Mildly Amusing Email Exchange That May Interest Only Me."

Meanwhile, I'm still without lunch plans, but I don't really mind. Until I can find someone to take me to Balthazar's, Gotham Bar and Grill, Spice Market, Jean Georges, Craftbar, Gramercy Tavern (again), Asia to Cuba, or someplace else that I really want to go, I am not that motivated to pursue lunch plans. I mean, it becomes an exercise in pursuing overly busy associates to take you to a good but not great lunch at Bull Run or something, during which you will talk a little about work and a little about other slightly personal, but mostly non-personal, topics. If someone offers, I'm in, because it's a free lunch. But I'm not really that into doing the legwork anymore.

1. Disregard the positive reviews of this restaurant posted on MenuPages. It is clearly an inferior restaurant -- trust me.

2. If you are a football fan and do not currently read Peter King (on SI.com and syndicated on Yahoo! Sports), you need to start. He gives good analysis, has good contacts within the league/teams, and is pretty entertaining. He is, next to SI's Dr. Z, the best football writer out there. He used to come in second place to Gregg Easterbrook (who writes Tuesday Morning Quarterback, formerly on ESPN's Page 2, now on NFL.com), but TMQ jumped the shark awhile ago and is just too difficult to keep up with. I think TMQ lost its readability about the time that Easterbrook decided that every team needed a meta-nickname. Of course, that's kind of what we do here on BRY, so maybe we'll suffer the same fate. Time will tell.

Sunday, June 26, 2005

My Brain Type

Those of you who frequent the blogosphere probably frequently see links to various "personality tests" or other types of self-analysis tools that are supposed to give you a picture of what kind of person you are. However, I typically find these test results somewhat unsatisfactory, because I feel like they are too prone to "gaming" and don't capture a nuanced enough view of the mind.

In addition, I think the tests (particularly those which are trying to determine "personality type" tend to ask questions about which situation you "prefer" or how you "conceive yourself." This leads to a lot of internal moral judgments about which is the "better" or "more acceptable" answer, which is going to skew the test results to describe the person you think you should be, rather than the person that you are.

All that said, I found a test this morning which I think actually gives a good view of my mind. The questions are so abstract that you are forced to make a decision based truly on what you think rather than what you think you should think. You can take the test here.

My results:

Left : 50%
Right : 50%

Auditory : 37%
Visual : 63%

BRY, you exhibit an even balance between left- and right- hemisphere dominance and a slight preference for visual over auditory processing. With a score this balanced, it is likely that you would have slightly different results each time you complete this self-assessment quiz.

You are a well-rounded person, distinctly individualistic and artistic, an active and multidimensional learner. At the same time, you are logical and disciplined, can operate well within an organization, and are sensitive towards others without losing objectivity. You are organized and goal-directed. Although a "thinking" individual, you "take in" entire situations readily and can act on intuition.

You sometimes tend to vacillate in your learning styles. Learning might take you longer than someone of equal intellect, but you will tend to be more thorough and retain the material longer than those other individuals. You will alternate between logic and impulse. This vacillation will not normally be intentional or deliberate, so you may experience anxiety in situations where you are not certain which aspect of yourself will be called on.

With a slight preference for visual processing, you tend to be encompassing in your perceptions, process along multidimensional paths and be active in your attacking of situations or learning.

Overall, you should feel content with your life and yourself. You are, perhaps, a little too critical of yourself -- and of others -- while maintaining an "openness" which tempers that tendency. Indecisiveness is a problem and your creativity may not be in keeping with your potential. Being a pragmatist, you downplay this aspect of yourself and focus on the more immediate, obvious and the more functional.

Saturday, June 25, 2005

White Light/White Heat

It is so hot today. After a week's reprieve from the miserable hot, humid weather, the heat has returned. Once again, the simple crime of movement leads to the sentence of sweat dripping down your back. According to Yahoo! (fn1) weather, it is 86, with a heat index of 88. I think it's closer to 95, with a heat index of 105.

That's only my opinion, but since most weather forecasts seem to be based mostly on opinion, I think my opinion is at least as valid as that of Yahoo! weather. In fact, I think it's more valid. After all, Yahoo! is based in Palo Alto or something. And, it's a computer. It's probably 72 with a nice, non-humid ocean breeze in Palo Alto. How does the computer there know what it "feels like" to be in New York? I think I have more experiential basis on which to judge what it "feels like" outside. And I say it feels like it's 105 degrees. fn2.

Given that it feels like 105 degrees, it was a particularly bad choice on my part to wear a gray wool suit to church. I mean, don't get me wrong. It looked fine (fn3), especially paired with the navy/purple/white rep stripe tie I was wearing. fn4. It was just that the suit was like my own portable oven.

One bad choice, I suppose, deserves another. So after lunch at Baluchi's (always reliable Indian, and at lunch it's nice and cheap) and desert at Crumbs Bake Shop (always good cupcakes), I decided to not abandon my friends and instead walk through Central Park with them. Carrying my guitar.

Yeah, I don't think I need to go into how bad of a choice that was. Let's just say that I was hot, a little sweaty (and by "a little" I mean "extremely"), and worn down. By the end of the trek (from 81st and 2nd ave to 66th and b'way, by way of meandering through the park), you could have peeled me off the sidewalk with a spatula. Two hours after I got home, I'm finally just returning to normal.

I think I need to stop making decisions today, because all of them seem to be coming out fairly poorly.

1. One should always include the "!" after "Yahoo." It's their trademark, after all. As an aspiring attorney, I'm highly protective of trademarks and trade dress. I wouldn't want anyone to get the real "Yahoo!" confused with "Yahoo" without the "!".

2. It goes without saying, but we're talking degrees Fahrenheit here. Not degrees Kelvin. 105 degreesK is not a temperature you want to experience. I suppose 100 degreesC would not be much better.

3. As fine as this particular suit can look, that is. Never buy Tasso Elba suits from Macy's. Macy's tries to market them as their "upscale/cool" store brand, but the cut and styling is horrible. It's far too boxy, and just does not hang well. It certainly does not have the closer cuts that look more modern. I should have noticed it when I was buying it, but my eyes were blinded by the low price. In addition, it's somewhat difficult to judge the fit of a suit when you just throw it on in a store. It's more as you wear it that you realize it makes you look like an old man.

4. I think the tie looks better with the gray suit than with the black suit I paired it with last time. The gray helps the purple pop out more because it's lighter, where as the black I think overpowers the purple slightly and makes it sink back into the tie.

White Stripes tix....but not the ones I wanted

I swear I establish new marks for stupid thinking, or lack thereof, sometimes.

This morning White Stripes tickets went on sale for their show at Keyspan Park in September. Seeing as I had missed the Stripes the last couple times they came to town, I was determined to get tickets for this one. So at 8:58, I had the page loaded up on TicketBastard and was refreshing it constantly to get in at the first possible moment.

I searched under best available and it came up with "field" gen admin tix. Of course, because TM is retarded, they didn't have an accurate map of the venue -- the only map was the "boxing" configuration. Because of this, I wasn't thinking straight and interpreted "field" as "lawn" seating. Not terrible, but not great and certainly not close.

So I opened a new window (as not to lose the tickets I had already found) and searched specifically for "stadium" tickets and found a pair. I bought those.

Of course, after I had hit the "buy" button, I suddenly realized my mistake and felt really foolish. Now, it's going to be difficult to get close to the stage.

A question may occur to some of you: "Why not just buy the tickets that came up when you searched under 'best available'?" Let's put it this way....TM has a distinctly different definition of "best available" than that held by any music fan. I don't even know what their definition is. I just know that if you try several times, you can usually find very different results. This time, however, I should have trusted their results.

I am so annoyed. I'm sure I'll get over it though....it's just that momentary "I screwed up again" feeling.

So anyway, I have two White Stripes tix for Sept. 24. Who wants to join me?

Friday, June 24, 2005

Missed Connections

Some people may have heard me say this, but I find Craigslist "Missed Connections" to be incredibly hilarious. They are just so random, and usually so pathetic, that they provide endless amusement for me.

Most of them follow the same hackneyed formulas. Here's a couple examples:

Man sees hot woman. Has nothing intelligent to say. Thinks that posting a shot-in-the-dark message on Craigslist will somehow jumpstart the relationship.

Friday, Uptown 6 train, noon.... - m4w
You: Most likely the worlds most beautiful asian woman : )
Long hair,Tan shirt I think, gold bag, pink toe nails....

Me: Blue shirt, 5'8", caucasian, Bag full of art supplies,
prone to staring...

Us: We exchanged a few glances, wish I had the nerve to say something.
Wanna get together for coffee...?

(So you're a short, creepy white guy who stares at Asians on the train. Yet despite the fact that you judged her to be the world's most beautiful Asian woman, you don't even know what color her shirt was. Yeah, I'm sure you're just her type.)

Redhead Downtown 6 from 51st to Astor
We both got on the downtown 6 at 51st between 4:30 and 5:00...got off at 14th because our train was going to skip a few stops...you have red hair and were reading a book with Biker in the title if I am correct - I tried to catch the title but found myself distracted by your eyes...hope you read this because whether you respond or not I'd like you to know I think you are gorgeous...

("Distracted by your eyes..." Did you get that line out of Rod Stewart song or what?)

Even better, the man imagines some kind of connection with the woman he sees, and believes that pointing out this connection will make her swoon into his arms

to the HOT blonde in a white BMW Z3 on route 23 south this AM - m4w you know i was watching you and drooling over your beauty and the fact that you were driving a stick shift. i was in a wolswagen, and we were driving along 23 south. i got off onto 287, and you continued straight. If you are reading this, PLEASE write back. I dont expect anything,,,,,,,,,,but,,, just write.
(You don't expect anything my ass! You wouldn't be posting that if you expected nothing.)

Freakonomics on 2nd Ave - m4w
You were the amazingly appractive brunette in a rather short skirt reading Freakonomics while waiting for the bus on 2nd Ave between 56th and 57th...I went directly to Borders to pick up a copy so I might have something to initiate the conversation next time I see you...

(Yeah dude. She's going to be really impressed when she finds out that you read the book in an attempt to get in her pants.)

Then, there are the men who actually talk to the woman, but nothing comes of it. Regardless, they believe something should have come of it, so they post a random message on Craigslist begging for another chance.

my landlord showed you my apartment the other day
you were alone. my landlord showed you my apartment. it was a three bedroom on the 1st floor. my other roomate was sleeping and i was telling my landlord about how he had to call before showing the apartment.
anyways. you had glasses. i thought you were cute. we should hang out sometime

(Folks, I'm telling you, this is the stuff love is made of. Telling your landlord not to bring people around without calling first. It makes me heart flutter just to think about it.)

Smoking outside the Delancey - m4w
You were at the Delancey last nite (Thursday) seeing a band. With a friend I think. You’re a nurse..we talked about smoking and Hasidim. Wished we could talk more.

(Sorry, I think the nurse is probably attending to other patients right now, or she would have talked more to you at the time.)

Every now and then, however, someone breaks the mold. Take this guy, for instance:
Corporate Challenge 6/22 - MC w/t-shirt size & Altria girl
OK so I thought I was on the line for L but I ended up getting an XL. If there is anyone out there who has an *unworn* mens L (who needs an XL), feel free to get in touch and we'll trade. Otherwise I suppose I'll take up swimming... in the shirt.

(damn that pre-shrunk technology)

Oh... looking that girl from Altria I kept seeing/passing... running side by side with your friend, brunette w/ponytail, usually on the left. Would love for you to get in touch if you read these things...


(This is very ambiguous. Does this post really have anything to do with the shirt, or is it all a more subtle way to try to get the Altria girl's attention? I mean, does this dude really care about the too-large shirt? All those Corporate Challenge shirts are is a badge to say "I work way too hard at some supposedly important job, but I'm really a cool person because once a year, I indulge my meathead tendencies by competing with other completely stressed-out, workaholic, white pasty office kids." That's not to say there's anything wrong with the Corporate Challenge -- it just is what it is.

I think the whole reason he mentioned the shirt was to a.) not look completely pathetic posting the MC with the Altria girl (throwing it on the end as if it's a casual aside) and b.) show how cute and funny he is with the whole "I suppose I'll take up swimming... in the shirt" line. Which admittedly is a good line.)

I hope things work out for Corporate Challenge boy. I'm sure he could use some sort of a positive diversion in his life. And what better diversion than getting with some woman who probably has the responsibility of suppressing data about the dangers of smoking? She could get him freecigarettess and everything. fn1.

1. Altria is the tobacco giant formerly known as Philip Morris, which also owns Kraft Foods. (So I suppose she might be in charge of picking out Italian words and phrases to put on the back of the Romano cheese container, in the "Learn to Speak Italian!" box.)

Tasty

Just returned from lunch at Delmonico's. The restaurant is known more for its historical significance than its culinary quality.

Opened in 1837, it was the first restaurant in the United States. Over the years, chefs at Delmonico's created dishes including Eggs Benedict and Baked Alaska. Celebrity diners include Presidents Jackson, Lincoln, and Buchanan, Generals John Dix and George Custer, authors Charles Dickens, Mark Twain, and Willa Cather, and capitalist and philanthropist Andrew Carnegie.

Still located in its original building, the restaurant oozes traditional class and snobbery. Decorated in dark wood paneling and deep burgundies, it is terribly quiet, and one almost expects to see men in three-piece suits, smoking cigars and closing deals.

The food was solid. For me, the highlight of the meal was the beefsteak tomato, buffalo mozzarella, and roasted red pepper appetizer. The cheese was chewy and tangy, and the tomatoes were perfectly ripened. We also got many sides to go with the main course. The hashbrowns, while looking impressive, were somewhat lacking in flavor, while the creamed spinach was also bland. The creamed potatoes were good, but not great. Particularly disappointing was the asparagus, which was flavorless, too large and stringy, and overcooked. It was especially disappointing in light of the fantastic asparagus I got at Aquagrill on Tuesday.

The main course for me was, of course, pasta. That makes three firm lunches this week, and three pasta dishes. Restaurants would do well to find chefs who have a modicum of creativity and can come up with a vegetarian dish that isn't what everyone else in town is already doing.

This is where the heart breaks

In the words of Bob Mould, "Tears fill up my eyes/ I'm washed away with sorrow." fn1. There is no easy way to say it, and frankly I don't want to write it, but the Pistons lost last night. It's over. The magical playoff run, where they never seemed to play up to their potential until it mattered most, is done. Their run as being NBA Champions -- and knowing that they were going to go for a second straight title -- faded into the San Antonio night, as the sum of one poorly-executed offensive possession after another. The Defenders, as Detroit styled themselves during the playoff run, blew their defense a few too many times to get the last W. This probably ranks as the worst sports loss I've ever experienced, but more on that later.

I haven't read any news coverage of the game, nor have I watched any. It's far too painful. I turned off the TV as the final buzzer was sounding, avoiding the cruel sight of the Spurs hugging, the fans celebrating, and confetti raining from the ceiling, as the Pistons trudged dejectedly off the court, shoulders slumped. Of course, Larry Brown and Pop would hug, and congratulate each other. The Spurs and the Pistons would dap, hug, and slap each other on the back. These are two class organizations, with rosters which are, to a man, stocked with classy guys. But that doesn't mean I want to see Detroit getting the "nice try, come again next year" pats on the butt from Bruce Bowen.

Moreover, I couldn't bear to hear the plaudits for Manu Ginobili's clutch play, or the blathering about how Tim Duncan finally came up big in a big game, hitting his free throws and proving that he could be an assassin when needed. But I particularly did not want to hear a single reference to Robert Horry. I swear if I hear another person say "Big Shot Rob" (or worse yet, "Big Shot Bob"), I will have to cram my fist down my throat to keep from vomiting.

Obviously, as a Pistons fan, I have to give credit to the Spurs. They came in and took care of their business enough to win the game. But at the same time, the Pistons could have won this game. They should have won this game. They should have already won this series, probably in six games. That, again, is a topic for later. But despite all their bad play, described below, the Pistons had this game tied well into the fourth quarter. Then they lost it. Yes, the Spurs made big shots, and yes, the Spurs played great defense. But they did those things because Detoit allowed them it through inferior execution.

To me, the Pistons lost for a few key reasons:
1. Terrible defensive rotations throughout the game, but especially at the end. The Pistons gave up too many open three-pointers (many of which the Spurs converted) because of bad defensive rotation. They doubled down on Duncan too much, which left the perimeter open. With a team as well-coached as the Spurs, bringing someone over from the weak side to double is still going to create an open shot, because Duncan will kick out to the perimeter on the strong side and it will get swung over to the weak side through good cross-court ball movement. Too many times, the Pistons' doubles resulted in exactly this happening, leading to open jumpers.
The special killer was at the end of the game, when the Pistons still had an outside chance to come back, and on consecutive possessions, the Spurs exploited the poor rotations to hit long jumpers (one by Duncan from the corner, and a three by Bowen on the wing) with 2 seconds or less on the shot clock. Those two possessions were what broke Detroit's back.

2. Poor perimeter defense, allowing excessive dribble penetration. Listen, I know Ginobili is quick. But the number of times he got into the lane for uncontested layups and dunks was unacceptable. This falls directly on Billups, Hamilton, and Prince. Their bigs were saddled with foul trouble, and couldn't afford to try to contest those shots. They had to keep Ginobili from driving, even if it resulted in him jacking up some threes.

3. Poor offensive execution by Chauncy Billups. I hate to pin anything on Chauncy, who has come up so big so many times. But this time, Mr. Big Shot couldn't deliver, and I belive it was because he tried to force the action too much. Over the last two years, he has vastly improved his ability to "pick his spots" and impose himself on the game. This time, he did so too early and too often. While he made a couple big jumpers, he was dribbling far too much in the fourth quarter rather than moving the ball. Credit this partially to the Spurs' defense, which was locked down on his teammates. But he should have moved the ball more, rather than running 15 seconds off the shot clock trying to create something himself. Some of the shots he jacked up were ill-advised, to say the least. The most disturbing failure, however, was Detroit's refusal to take advantages of certain mismatches on the offensive end. Once Bowen switched to guarding Billups, Hamilton had an extreme mismatch on Brent Barry. Billiups needed to force-feed him the ball and let Rip abuse Barry. In addition, Prince should have been able to create over Ginobili. But he didn't have the ball. This leads to point 4.

4. The disappearance of Tayshaun Prince. All season, the Pistons said Prince was their MVP, and he played like it. Not in the finals, however. Over the course of seven games, he pulled a bigger disappearing act than Houdini. Sure, he got a shot here and there. He made some defensive plays, and collected some good rebounds and loose balls. But this guy has crazy offensive capabilities. There is absolutely no reason why he didn't exert his will on the Spurs. Ben Wallace played a far larger role in the offense than Tayshaun, and that pretty much sums up the Pistons' problems.

5. The officiating. I am not going to blame the game on stripes, and I certainly think it was called fairly. It was just called terribly -- a Game 7 in the NBA Finals should not be decided based on ticky-tack calls. Let the players play. The foul trouble destroyed Detroit's rhythm, both offensively and defensively, from the first quarter on. With Billups having to sit out a substantial chunk of the first quarter, and Rasheed Wallace being handcuffed for most of the game, the Pistons' offense could never get into a flow. More importantly, with all three bigs (Ben, Rasheed, and McDyess) in foul trouble for the entire game, the defense had to play scared all night. Even though players were trying to adjust to the way the game was being called, when you already have 3 fouls and it's the first minute of the third quarter, it's impossible to play anything close to agressive defense for fear of picking up the next foul. Anytime you see the team playing a lineup of Elden Campbell, Tayshaun Prince, Rip Hamilton, Lindsey Hunter, and Chauncy Billups in Game 7, you KNOW there is going to be a serious falloff in the level of play.

So that's that. It's over. Any other year, against any other team, I would be happy to see the Spurs win. But instead, it's one of the most bitter feelings I've ever felt. Why is this loss so painful? Most importantly, it's because it's the decisive game of the NBA Finals. There are no "ifs, ands, or buts." If you lose a series in six games, it doesn't hurt as much, because you know that even if you had won Game 6, you still would have had to win Game 7. Nothing is guaranteed. Here, you know you would have been champions if you could have just gotten 7 extra points. It also hurts because after seven games in the series (and 25 games in the playoffs), you're so invested in the team. You've been living and dying with them, hoping against hope that they'll pull it out in the end. Then the end comes, and they didn't pull it out. The disappointment is stark.

Other factors make the end of the Pistons' run particularly difficult. It may well be the close of their championship era. Larry Brown may be leaving town. While the team returns its core players, next year will be an uphill battle. Indiana will be back, fully staffed, and looking for revenge. Miami will have Wade (presumably improved as he gets even more experience) and Shaq looking for a trip to the Finals. Chicago is rapidly improving, while Cleveland, as LeBron grows as a player, is only going to get better. In the West, the Spurs look to have the beginning of a dynasty. Parker and Ginobili are still young, and they will get better, while TD will continue to put up his 20 and 10 for at least another five years. The Suns, the Mavs, the Rockets, and the Sonics will challenge them as well. There is certainly not going to be a clear road to the title for future Pistons squads.

Greatness can be so fleeting. I remember when I first became a sports fan, the Pistons were in the middle of their Back to Back title run in 1989/1990. Being new to this whole "sports fan" thing, I had no understanding of the historical significance of winning an NBA title, and the difficulty of going back. In 1991, the Pistons were swept by the Bulls in the East Finals. The next year, they lost a difficult five-game series to the Knicks, starting a run of ten years without winning a playoff series and many difficult, mediocre seasons. The window of opportunity can be slammed shut very quickly, and it's painful to fail to take advantage of opportunity when it presents itself. fn2.

But perhaps the most painful part of this Pistons loss is that it was so unexpected. Over the past two years, the Pistons have made a habit of winning, no matter what the odds. Even though your brain is telling you that there is no reasonable way they can win, they will win. This is the most mentally tough team in the league. Before last night, they had won 10 straight close out games, and over the past three seasons, they were 8-1 in elimination games. So even though San Antonio had so many advantages, you just assumed the Pistons would pull it out. Particularly when the score was tied in the fourth quarter, you had to like Detroit's chances, even though the wheels were falling off the offense and the defense was as open as a 24-hour 7/11. But they just couldn't convert. And when a gut feeling that was entrenched in your soul is torn away from you, thrown in a blender, ground up, and then sprinkled down on your head like the confetti drifting from the SBC Center roof, that, my friends, hurts.

1. These lyrics are the opening line of "If I Can't Change Your Mind," off Sugar's Copper Blue album.

2. To demonstrate the elusiveness of an NBA title, think about this stat: Over the past 26 years (since the 1979-1980 season -- basically my lifetime), only seven teams have won titles. (If you're interested, the breakdown is: L.A. Lakers - 8; Chicago Bulls - 6; Boston Celtics - 3; Detroit Pistons - 3; San Antonio Spurs - 3; Houston Rockets - 2; Philadelphia 76ers - 1.) Over shorter periods of time, the dominance is even more pronounced, as the 15-year period during which the Lakers, Celtics, Bulls, Pistons, and Rockets dominated all the titles, with the Rockets only winning because Jordan was playing baseball. If you were in the NBA during those years, and didn't play for one of those teams, your chances of a ring were basically nonexistant. Just ask Barkley, Drexler, Wilkins, et al.

New characters, and blog updates

At the suggestion of a member of the cast of characters, there have been some slight updates to the list. See, you have to think of this blog as an interactive experience. I'm all about pleasing the readers. And by readers, I mean myself. Since I'm probably the primary reader of the blog. But, on the outside chance that there is actually life on Mars that is reading my blog (fn1), I want to please the outsiders too. So suggestions will likely be incorporated, to the extent that they are reasonable. fn2.

Besides, I have funny friends, so if they make funny suggestions, I will be more than happy to steal those ideas to make my blog funnier.


Other updates:
  • I added an RSS feed. See the link at the right.
  • I added statistics collection from StatCounter.
  • I updated my profile link so that on the front page, it no longer links to Blogger.com's terrible profile feature.
  • I added a link to the "Characters" post on the right sidebar.

Outstanding issue: On archived pages (individual post display), the right sidebar is screwed up. I haven't yet figured out how to control the template for that.

1. R1, you better be reading (and appreciating) that Bowie reference.

2. Disclaimer: This statement creates no obligation on the part of BRY toward any other party, nor does it establish any warranties, expressed or implied.

Thursday, June 23, 2005

My new imaginary friend

The great thing about becoming a blogger is that now I can have imaginary friends. I mean, isn't that part of the whole "internet culture" thing? I suppose some people experience this part of internet culture by having a "real" girlfriend (blonde, 36-24-36 fn1, former model) who is actually an overweight, hairy, 46-year-old man who still lives in his mother's basement. fn2. But I think for me, a wholly imaginary friend would be safer and more "fun." fn3.

This whole topic of an imaginary friend came up because of my friend R2, who after reading my blog had this response:
"...you just need to find two D friends that I can hang out with so you can say 'Me and R2D2 ...' C'mon, it'll be fun."
R2, as usual, is right on the money. Unfortunately, I don't really have any D friends. I looked through my phone and found only a few Ds. fn4. None of them figure to play such an important role in my life that they'll make it to the blog. Besides, I don't see them becoming tight with R2 in the near future.

So it became clear to me that the solution was two imaginary friends, both of whom had names starting with D. It would be like "my brother Darryl, and my other brother Darryl." My other brother Darryl, aka D2, happens to be close friends with R2, and we always hang out together.

So I think R2D2 and I will maybe grab some Vegetarian's Paradise (aka VP2) tonight, hopefully along with K2 (the BRY character, not the ski brand) and some other law school peeps. Maybe I'll even ask K1 and S1 if they want to join us.


1. The Violent Femmes have a great song called "36-24-36." Some of the lyrics go



see a girl walkin' down the street
just the kind of girl that I'd like to meet
it ain't her hair, her clothes, her feet
somethin' much more discreet...
36-24-36, I want lots of pretty chicks
36-24-36, I want lots of pretty chicks

Good stuff, I'm telling you.
Speaking of the Femmes, as I was searching for lyrics, I found their summer tour schedule, which does not include a date in New York. (In fact, they are only playing two dates on the east coast - Baltimore and Virginia Beach.) They have not played New York since last summer, at Irving Plaza -- a show that I stupidly missed. Femmes, I think it's time for a date in New York. We'll sell out, I guarantee.


2. Just to be perfectly clear, there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING wrong with hairy men. Only hairy men posing as young nubile women. Or posing as women, period, I suppose.

3. Probably not as much fun as certain tshirts with certain inscriptions, but fun none the less.

4. The phone book of my cell is the only way I keep track of my friends. If you're not in my phone, then you almost certainly are not my friend. Of course, if you are in my phone, it does not necessarily follow that you're my friend.
What's more interesting about all this, however, is the extremely high number of As and Js in my phone book, in addition to the heavy skewing toward the first half of the alphabet. That, however, is fodder for another post.

Viva la Vinyl!

You know how they say that food you grow yourself just tastes better? (Just a note: I strongly believe that food you pay a farmer at a farmers' market to grow for you tastes just as good in an objective sense and tastes even better in a subjective sense, because it lacks all the bitter memories of weeding rows of green beans under the scorching sun. And no, I don't resent gardening. Not in the least.)

Anyway, I strongly believe that the same principle applies to music -- it just sounds better when it's played on vinyl. There is just something better.....warmer, fuller, more personal....about music coming from vinyl. And the experience of dropping a needle on the spinning disc and hearing the crackle of static and then hearing music start to flow. You just can't beat it.

As much as I am freaking in love with my iPod, and appreciate CD audio, DVD-Audio, HDCDs, and all the rest of the digital audio formats, vinyl is the ultimate way to truly experience music. On tonight's playlist has been King Crimson's In the Court of the Crimson King (on original vinyl from 1969) and the Allman Brother's Eat a Peach, featuring the beautiful slide guitar of Duane Allman shortly before his death.

As usual, Pearl Jam said it best: SPIN THE BLACK CIRCLE!

Beautiful San Francisco

This past weekend, the lovely J1 and I trekked to San Fran for her cousin's wedding. An added attraction was that J2&E are living in SF for the summer, so it gave us a chance to see them. We hung out and saw some of the city, then went to the wedding on Saturday. Then on Sunday we went out to Napa, which was nice. All in all, it was a great time, although I was feeling the pain of the redeye back on Monday.

Here's some pictures of the fun:

J1 and I at the wedding.


J1's sister (S4) and her friend Brent, also at the wedding. Her dress was uber cool, and Brent's suit was kicktushy. Boy knows how to dress himself.


J2&E met us out in Napa on Sunday. We visited the Culinary Institute of America, which is located in a rather elaborate building in St. Helena.


Some vineyards, with mountains/hills in the background. (This is the worst caption ever put on a photo.)

Image hosted by Photobucket.com
In SF, we went to Fort Point for great views under the Golden Gate Bridge.

Image hosted by Photobucket.com
This is at the Palace of Fine Arts. I think it is a cute picture of me and J1. E was being sneaky taking all these pictures of us canoodling.

Wednesday, June 22, 2005

Shelter from the storm

I had a close call with rain today, which almost got me busted for being a slacker.

I had a CLE at lunch, which meant I was going a little stir-crazy in my office, especially since I had no work to do. So I decided to slip out and go to Banana Republic in the World Financial Center a few blocks away. My goal, of course, was to find the tie that the crazy lady stole from under my grasp last night.

Once outside, I noticed that it was getting a little cloudy, but didn't think it was a big deal. I went to the WFC, found nothing that I really wanted to buy at either BR or Gap, and headed back.

But by the time I got back outside, the weather had taken a serious turn for the worse. Black clouds were rolling in from Jersey. (Of course, I'm not sure this is any different than usual.) It looked like a massive downpour would start any minute. Of course, if it did, I'd be caught outside without an umbrella, which would make my little excursion pretty obvious when I got back to the office.

So I rushed to work and managed to beat the rain. When I got up to my office, it was actually pretty awesome. From my vantage point on the 55th floor, I could see the huge bank of clouds rolling in, and the sheets of rain falling to the west. Across the harbor, you could actually see a line where the rain started. Plus, the lightening was coming down pretty fast, which meant I had a great view of the bolts lighting up the sky.

I wish I had a camera so I could record it, but as it is, you'll just have to imagine how cool it was.

BTW, the title is a reference to a great Bob Dylan song.

Hoggish Woman

Last night, I stopped by Banana Republic because I saw that their Summer Sale was starting. It turned out that they had really good deals, especially on ties, so I was loading up.

I was so annoyed, however, because this lady was such a pig. She was looking at the ties at the same time I was, and she was literally body-blocking me so I couldn't get to the ties hanging on one side of the rack. What's worse is that in one style of tie (a great navy blue tie with green rep stripes), there were only two left, and she took BOTH of them. If there had been one left and she had taken it, I would have been bummed, but that's life. But why did she have to take BOTH of them? Who needs two of the same tie?

But to add insult to injury, I ended up at the checkout next to her. She's on the cell with her husband/boyfriend, and she has no idea what she's buying or what he wants (and it sounds like he doesn't know either). I mean, this woman was clueless. She's asking the cashier how to match ties to shirts (and the ties and shirts she had looked terrible together). She didn't know what size of shirt her man wore. And, to top it off, she asked if all the ties were the same size. How dumb can she be? She obviously knew absolutely nothing about men's clothes. Her husband probably didn't either. They couldn't appreciate even one of those ties, let alone both of them.

It's just wrong that she hogged both the ties and didn't give me the chance to buy one.

Characters

As I noted in my first post, I desire some degree of anonymity here, and I assume my friends do as well. So to protect the innocent (or guilty, as the case may be), here are my friends.

A1 - Friend from church. Early 30s, male, academic dean at a large college in the City.
A2 - Friend from church. Early 30s, female, married to A1, psychologist at a prestigeous New Jersey academic institution.
A3 - Friend from school. Late 20s, female, currently summering at a firm in LA. Has a small white Chihuahua, L1.
A4 - Co-worker, mid 20s, attends law school in Chicago.

D1 - My brother Darryl
D2 - My other brother Darryl. A good friend of R2.

E - Friend from church. Mid 20s, female, physical therapy grad student. Married to J2.

J1 - My girlfriend, mid 20s, musician and teacher. From California, resides in the City. Beautiful, brilliant, and talented.
J2 - Friend from church. Mid 20s, male, law student at another law school in the City. A dear friend of mine. Currently summering at a firm in San Francisco, but resides in the City. Married to E.

K1 - Friend from church. Mid 20s, female, graduate student in educational technology. Is the only person who gets my really dorky hax0r2 jokes.
K2 - Friend from school. Mid 20s, former computer programmer.
K4 - K1's friend from California. Math teacher. Why is she K4 and not K3? Well, because she said she didn't want to be K3.

KS - my new psych

L1 - A3's small white Chihuahua. Her cuteness and adorability is only surpassed by that of her owner.

S1 - Friend from church. Early 20s, female, graduate interior design student. Lives in Brooklyn.
S2 - Friend from school. Thirty, male, complete badass.
S3 - S2's lovely wife. Late 20s, management consultant.
S4 - My girlfriend's little sister. And by little I mean she's two years yonger.

R1 - Close friend from high school. Mid 20s, student. Huge sports and music fan.
R2 - Friend from school. Mid 20s, from DC by way of California. Also a big computer guy.
R3 - Friend from school. Mid 20s, from the midwest like me, so we can bond talking about the Packers, the Lions, and how much we hate the Vikings. Plus, his brother went to Michigan State (BRY's alma mater), which speaks highly of his family.

More characters will be added as necessary.

What's in a name?

I decided, at this point in my life, that one of the most cliched things I could do would be to start a blog. fn1. After all, everyone else, along with their mothers and their dogs, has a blog. About the only thing that could possibly be more predictable would be for me to drop out of law school, start eating 'shrooms, and take some time to "find myself." fn2.

However, as the Cranberries asked, "Everyone Else Is Doing It So Why Can't We?" Of course, I have always been one to happily start new things, but finishing or maintaining projects has never been my cup of tea. So it is entirely possible that this blogging experience will start out with a flurry of activity and then disappear quickly. We'll see just how lazy I am.

Early on, I ran into difficulties, and that was just in picking a name. Choosing an appropriate name is a challenge for several reasons:
  • The desire to look cool. The name of a blog should be an extension of one's personality. Consequently, picking a lame name should be avoided at all costs, unless one has a lame personality. For example, "Nathan's Blog About How Law School is Cool!!" just doesn't work.
  • The desire to stay anonymous. Now don't get me wrong. I know nothing is really anonymous on the internet, which is why I have no intention of dishing good dirt or saying really stupid things about my employer which could land me in hot water. Anyone with half a brain and a modicum of knowledge about the internet could track down my identity. I just want to make it slightly more difficult to do so. This prevents me from using my name in the blog title, like K does. fn3.
  • Late adoption of blog technology. As mentioned above (or, in keeping with proper Blue Booking, supra), everyone already has blogs. Apparently, most of those people are with Blogger.com, which means that I had to try about 23 different names before I found one that worked. And even then I had to add the weak "-NYC" tag to make it unique.

Despite these challenges, I persevered and found a title. So what does it mean? Or, as Shakespeare said, "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." fn4.

Black Red Yellow is the title of a Pearl Jam song. (It is the B-side to "Hail Hail" from the No Code album.) I am a huge PJ fan (favorite band of all time) and am a big music fan generally.

But the back story behind why PJ named the song Black Red Yellow adds another layer of significance. The song was named by Dennis Rodman, who was friends with the members of PJ during the mid-90s. fn5. Rumor has it that Rodman dyed the PJ "stickman" logo in his hair during the 1996 NBA Finals in exchange for naming rights to a PJ song. BRY is his song (apparently, black represents his skin color, red represents the Bulls, and yellow was his hair color at the time). It contains his voice on Ed's answering machine and a reference to Jordan. fn6.

So in short (this is for all you people bored by my ramblings), Black Red Yellow represents my love of music, PJ, sports, and sports starts who hustle. NYC was added on because some dastardly person had already used the BRY name.

1. I realize that I need an accent on the "e" in "cliched." However, I am currently distinctly unmotivated to figure out the ASCII command to create the e' character. So you'll just have to deal with it.
I am also discovering that a major problem with this Blogger software is that there is no footnote function. As someone who is very dedicated to using proper Blue Book style in all my writing, I want to drop footnotes to provide references or explanations for everything. I suppose either I will have to break this footnote habit or do footnotes the way Lexis does.

2. Contrary to the rumors my parents have heard, this is not in my immediate future.

3. For identification of the characters in my blog, see the "Characters" post.

4. I am so clever. And by "clever," I mean "incredibly toolish." Not only did I get a pop culture reference into this post, but I also managed a Shakespeare quote. Aren't I erudite?

5. For the non-basketball fans out there, Rodman played in the NBA in the 1980s and 1990s, and was one of the best pure rebounders to ever play the game. He was also an excellent defender. Unheralded out of college, he became a key member of five championship teams (1989 and 1990 Detroit Pistons and 1996, 1997, and 1998 Chicago Bulls) through hard work and tenacious play. As his career progressed, he started to get a little crazy, with excessive body piercings, tatoos, and constantly changing hair color. He also engaged in publicity stunts to draw attention to himself. Despite this, I've always been a huge Rodman fan because between the lines, he played with ultimate intensity and was willing to do the little things to help his team win.

6. Eventually, PJ cut off contact with Rodman after his erratic behavior became too much of a problem.

Curses!

My bad luck is already beginning -- or else God is trying to tell me not to start a blog. I typed up an entire first post (it was pretty long, and took like 40 minutes) and then, through my own incompetence, lost it. I will try retyping it, but I am sure that nothing could be as clever and brilliant as the just-lost post.

Profile

Black Red Yellow is the work of a mid-20s male law student living, working, and going to school in New York City. Expect to hear rants about sports and music, two of the biggest passions of BRY, along with commentary on toolish law students, life in a large law firm, and the rank stupidity of random people in NYC, which is both a pet peeve and an endless source of amusement for BRY.

BRY is in a happily committed relationship (sorry ladies and non-traditional men) with a great girl named J1. Ok, her name isn't really J1, but for our purposes, that's what we'll call her. He is in a not-so-happy, but committed relationship with his parents. (It could be argued that the commitment in this relationship is more the chains of blood ties, but that is a digression.)

If you would like to contact BRY, please email blackredyellownyc AT gmail DOT com. If you have BRY's "real" email, please feel free to use that too.