Ignore for a moment the simple fact that most of the increased airport security measures implemented after 9-11 have little to do with increasing actual security (come on -- banning nail clippers?) and are instead aimed at increasing a sense of security among air travelers. Imagine, instead, that these changes were actually meaningful to some reasonable degree. Even then, airport security would still be a joke because THERE IS NO CONSISTENCY.
It's a fairly simple proposition that if something matters one place, or one day, it should matter in all places, on all days. If it doesn't, either it's not important or the places that fail to pay attention to that specific detail are not providing adequate protection.
One familiar example to anyone who has flown frequently after 9-11 is the shoe removal issue. Peter King (who writes Monday Morning Quarterback for SI.com) keeps a running report of which airports request that he removes his shoes and which airports do not. Some screeners will demand that you remove flip-flops, while others will let you pass through wearing anything short of Doc Martins. This leaves travelers confused, as they wonder whether or not to remove their shoes and then get yelled at by screeners telling them, "You don't need to put your flip-flops in the bin!" fn1.
Another example is the issue of when you need to show ID. Immediately after 9-11, you pretty much had to carry your ID with you everywhere. I think some airports were requiring an ID to use the bathroom. This is one issue that has finally be standardized, so that no matter where you go or what airline you're flying, you will never be asked for your ID when boarding.
My personal issue of inconsistency, which inspired this post and has made traveling a living Hades for me over the last two weeks, involves whether one must have an unexpired ID in order to fly. fn2.
Since my ID expired last year, I have flown at least 20 times. Maybe more. Yet I have yet to find any consistent pattern to whether it matters if your ID is expired or not. fn3.
In at least half of cases, the screener hasn't even noticed or cared that the license was expired.
In a few cases, the screener has given me a hassle, but I was able to talk my way out of it, usually using some combination of puppy dog eyes, my student ID card, or my Social Security card. The presence of a supervisor who knows even less than the screener usually provides a helpful element of confusion and allows me to pass through without too much trouble.
One day, the screener kept telling me that my license was expired. Then, she flipped it over and saw a change of address sticker, which included my past apartment number (7205). She decided that this must have been an extension of the expiration until July 2, 2005 (I did nothing to disabuse her of that notion), so she let me through.
Last week, when flying back to Michigan, there was a new level of scrutiny applied. The screener refused to let me through and told me to go back to get a "special" boarding pass. I did, and received a pass with the always-welcome "SSSS," designating me as a special security risk needing secondary screening. fn4. I went through security, and it was no problem. On the return flight, I tried to get through without the special boarding pass, since LGA is the main airport where I've had problems with the expiration date. However, the Detroit screener clearly had a d*ck up his tush and demanded that I get a special pass.
So I thought I had learned the "new" way that the system was going to work. fn5. Arriving at JFK on Friday for a flight to LAX, I asked for the special boarding pass to start out with. It seemed more sensible to get it out of the way the first time through line. However, when I told the ticket agent that my ID was expired, she became a total chatch and went ape on me.
She tried to tell me that there was no way that I could fly with an expired ID and that she wasn't going to issue me a boarding pass. I seriously think she was totally deprived and needed to go on some kind of power trip as revenge/fulfillment for her repressed urges. Finally, she relented (after reading a bunch of mumbo-jumbo off her computer about ID requirements) and gave me the SSSS boarding pass. I got through security screening (although the JFK screeners were so incredibly incompetent that it took awhile) and was on my way.
Fast forward to Sunday night. Leaving LAX to go back to JFK. Once again, I requested a SSSS boarding pass from the ticket agent, simply hoping that he wouldn't be like the chatch at JFK. Instead, he went the other direction. Since I had already printed my boarding pass from the kiosk, he informed me that it didn't say SSSS and it certainly wasn't in his authority to change it. After all, if the machine didn't think that I needed an SSSS, then who was he to question that.
I was begging him to give me the SSSS. I mean, how freaking often do people beg to be put in the secondary line so they can be wanded and patted down? I would not be asking for this if I didn't believe there was a HIGH chance of being rejected by the screener and forced to return to get the updated boarding pass. Given the length of lines and how late we were running, having that happen would assure me of missing the flight.
Still, the ticket agent refused. He looked at my school ID card and said that it was a perfectly good form of ID, and informed me that the screeners had absolutely no authority to reject my boarding pass for lack of an SSSS if he hadn't seen fit to put it on there.
With much trepidation, I went to the screener with my boarding pass and ID. He looked at my boarding pass, glanced at my ID, and handed them back to me, his thumb squarely covering the expiration date as he waived me through without question.
So at the end of the day, what's the answer? Does it matter if your ID is expired? If so, how do you handle it? Do you issue an SSSS boarding pass, or refuse to issue a boarding pass at all? Or do you treat it like it's no big deal.
Until the TSA and the airlines can find a consistent answer to this question, which is based on logic and not arbitrary judgment, I'm going to stick by my assertion that airport security is practically useless, because the enforcers don't even know what they're enforcing.
1. My solution to this is to just remove my shoes, no matter what. I'm not particularly OCD, so I'd rather just avoid the hassle, take off my shoes, and get it over with.
2. The reason that my drivers license, which expired last summer, has not been renewed is a long and sordid tale of woe which would amount to another extremely long post. Suffice to say that I have tried to both get a New York license on multiple occasions as well as apply for a passport, and have been denied on all fronts.
3. Personally, I see no reason why it should matter. The purpose of presenting photo ID is to authenticate that the ticketed passenger is the person who is attempting to board the flight. From that standpoint, a photo ID such as a drivers license, issued by a government agency, is valid for identification purposes whether it is expired or not.
The purpose of a drivers license is to show that you are legally allowed to operate a motor vehicle under the laws of the issuing state. Whether you are still allowed to drive in that state may change given time (and a presumed forgetfulness of traffic laws) or moving violations. Hence, the expiration date. However, the identification purposes of the document are no less valid simply because it will no longer allow you to act as a legal driver.
To tie the identification powers of the drivers license to its expiration date is absolutely illogical, given the purpose of the drivers license and the reason for it having an expiration date. Regardless, some screeners seem to think it matters.
4. And here I thought that the only way to get the SSSS was to fly a one-way ticket or buy tickets with cash, since of course terrorists planning a future attack would follow EXACTLY the same blueprint used by the 9-11 hijackers. Another example of the meaningless precautions added after 9-11.
5. A major problem with post-9-11 security is that it changes constantly. You can never anticipate what is going to matter tomorrow, which makes it a little difficult to effectively cooperate with the security.